Re: problem with timestamps

2001-12-30 Thread David T-G
Andy -- ...and then Andy Spiegl said... % % > Perhaps your patch should be included in the standard distribution as a % > user-configurable option? % Great idea. I don't remember if I already suggested that or not. % But let's give it a try: :-) % % Can we make a user-configurable option out

How to place a request of receipt for an outgoing mail?

2001-12-30 Thread Charles Jie
I was able to request for receipt in my mail while using Outlook Express or Netscape. But how to do it in Mutt? Thanks. charlie -- Charles Jie (¬ö¬K¿³) Keya Technologies (¶}¶®¬ì§Þ) (O) +886 2 2936 0813 (Mobile) 0920 397 746

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-30 Thread David T-G
Andre & Dan -- ...and then Andre Majorel said... % % There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying % writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to ... ...and then Dan Boger said... % % well, not sure how to do it with mutt - I have written a similar filte

Re: Getting mailing lists to work?

2001-12-30 Thread Andreas Herceg
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 08:03:53PM +0100, Andreas Landmark wrote: | On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 07:06:52PM +0100, Andreas Herceg wrote: | > On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:01:34AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote: | > | subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > | | > | instead of just mutt-users. | > | > subscribe mutt-us

Re: Getting mailing lists to work?

2001-12-30 Thread Andreas Landmark
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 07:06:52PM +0100, Andreas Herceg wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:01:34AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote: > | I use: > | > | subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > | instead of just mutt-users. > > subscribe mutt-users > > works just fine in my configuration. > But it'll matc

Re: Getting mailing lists to work?

2001-12-30 Thread Andreas Herceg
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:01:34AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote: | I use: | | subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | instead of just mutt-users. subscribe mutt-users works just fine in my configuration. -- Andreas Herceg [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Getting mailing lists to work?

2001-12-30 Thread Charles Jie
I use: subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of just mutt-users. It works. charlie On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 12:28:57PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: > Hi everyone > for some reason I can't get mutt to 'list-reply'. > In my .muttrc I have a line --- subscribe mutt-users > but whenever I try to list r

Re: Timestamps "feature"

2001-12-30 Thread Benjamin Smith
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 10:28:41PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Hi, > > I really don't get this guys, why mutt whouldn't modify a timestamp after > modifying a mbox! And the worst is that it rely on the timestamps to know > when there are new msgs. > The reason mutt does this is that a n

Re: charset in text/plain attachments: how to tune?

2001-12-30 Thread 2sheds
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:37:11PM +0300, boris karlov wrote: > mutt-1.2.5i > i have charset="koi8-r" in .muttrc, but mutt always assumes that my > text/plain attachments are in us-ascii charset if there is no certain > charset record in `Content-Type:' field. so i need to edit-type or manually >

Getting mailing lists to work?

2001-12-30 Thread Nick Wilson
Hi everyone for some reason I can't get mutt to 'list-reply'. In my .muttrc I have a line --- subscribe mutt-users but whenever I try to list reply it comes up with the gbnet address. I'm having a few problems I really need some help with but unless i can sort this one I'm stumped! if you can le

Timestamps "feature"

2001-12-30 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, I really don't get this guys, why mutt whouldn't modify a timestamp after modifying a mbox! And the worst is that it rely on the timestamps to know when there are new msgs. So tell me, is it "normal" to always get a N flag on all the mboxes until the timestamps are externally modified? I

Re: problem with timestamps

2001-12-30 Thread Andy Spiegl
> Perhaps your patch should be included in the standard distribution as a > user-configurable option? Great idea. I don't remember if I already suggested that or not. But let's give it a try: :-) Can we make a user-configurable option out of it, please??? Thanks, Andy. -- Dr. Andy Spiegl,