Hi, Thomas!
> > I've compiled mutt-1.3.28i in the default configuration on RedHat Linux
> > 7.2 (i386) with all updates. If I run it in xterm (from XFree86-4.1.0) or
> > in rxvt-2.7.6, it shows a blank screen. I can quit by pressing Ctrl-C and
> > Enter. The same executable runs on the Linux c
Hello,
I have a few questions I was unable to find answers for in the docs/web:
1. How can I disable the 'L' flag in 1.3.28i? It's redundant for me
since I already use procmail to sort my list-mail into folders.
2. How can I match match both '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in a subs
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 03:30:54PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
> I think a previous reply had the right answer: maildir isn't faster than mbox
> for all operations. I also get ridiculous delays by just typing 'ls' in a
> directory with thousands of files.
That depends on the fs you're using.
--
Ra
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:46:10PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> > 1. Switch to mbox and trade off individual mail modification speed
> > and corruption resistance for initial opening speed.
>
> yum. we use Maildir on our office mailserver so i've just ended up
> using this. it *is* pretty sl
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-17 18:26 -0500:
> * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 02:05]:
[...]
> If you just want mutt to keep
> a copy of all your messages
> depending on Email or Usenet
> then why not set FCC instead?
>
> Why *send* a copy?
[...]
> fcc-hook'~t .
i am currently using v1.3.27i. is it possible to show the
"flag-message" indicator for a collapsed thread? currently i see
when threads are collasped...
44 Mar 14 15.21 Maxim Sobolev5 cvs commit: ports/www/mozilla...
49 Mar 15 09.08 Matthew Reimer! Re: cvs commit: ports/www
* On 2002.03.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Claus Assmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (sorry, I don't read mutt-dev anymore, I'm getting more than 500
> mails a day (obviously I can only skim through the subjects and
> read only a subset...))
Lars doesn't read mutt-users anymore for th
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002, David Champion wrote:
> * On 2002.03.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> * "Claus Assmann" wrote:
> > I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that
> > "this should be fixed" / "will be looking into it". However, 1.3.28
> > still can't be configured without
* On 2002.03.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Claus Assmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that
> "this should be fixed" / "will be looking into it". However, 1.3.28
> still can't be configured without iconv. Any chance for a change?
I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that
"this should be fixed" / "will be looking into it". However, 1.3.28
still can't be configured without iconv. Any chance for a change?
I've attached a patch that seems to work. It's a bit of hack, a
clean solution would be to have a
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 02:05]:
> What I'm trying to accomplish is more or less the same Jerome (the
> original poster) wants. We use mutt with nntp-patch and want to set
> headers according to the fact if we are mailing or posting.
i got that. however, you did not descri
David T-G wrote:
> Yippee!
> My list of patch maintainers for my cocktail is currently
[...]
> Cedric Duval
[...]
> so all of you folks should get to work to make sure that your patches
> work under 1.3.28 :-)
The previous versions should apply cleanly, but anyway I've updated
them all for 1.3
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> When installing Mutt in my home directory, I get the following error:
[...]
> This is normal, but anyway, mutt_dotlock is already installed in
> /usr/bin. In fact, I just want to install the mutt binary. The
> problem is that Mutt has installed a mutt_dotlock with incorrec
Thomas Hurst wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Are there any tricks to speed this up, some caching mechanism or
> > something. I'm already using ReiserFS and maildir.
> The solutions are:
>
> 1. Switch to mbox and trade off individual mail modification speed
> and cor
At 3:20 PM EST on March 17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent off:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:22:24PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
> >
> > My freshmeat folder has about that many messages, but it only takes a few
> > seconds to open (never timed it), and I'm using mbox on ext3, so your setup
> > *should* be fas
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:22:24PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
>
> My freshmeat folder has about that many messages, but it only takes a few
> seconds to open (never timed it), and I'm using mbox on ext3, so your setup
> *should* be faster according to the hype.
>
> Are you reading from NFS, IMAP, PO
J. Scott Dorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The only problem with this is that if I let other apps do it, then my
> status line in mutt won't be accurate, and mutt won't offer ~/Mailbox
> as an option to change to when I hit 'c'.
There's something strange about all this... A program other that
* Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-17-02 14:40]:
> This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > The patched version works very nicely. Opening the 3500 messages
> > mailbox took 79 seconds with the prepacked mutt. It takes less then a
> > second with the patched version.
>
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-17-02 14:35]:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 06:45:32PM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> >
> > 2. Use a maildir caching patch to limit scanning of new messages to
> > operations on a dbm.
>
> After a nice walk in the park I've spent the evening patching and
>
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The patched version works very nicely. Opening the 3500 messages
> mailbox took 79 seconds with the prepacked mutt. It takes less then a
> second with the patched version.
Guess I was wrong, then; switching to the digest wouldn't have bee
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 06:45:32PM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
>
> 2. Use a maildir caching patch to limit scanning of new messages to
> operations on a dbm.
After a nice walk in the park I've spent the evening patching and
compiling mutt. The tricky part was figuring out which packages to
inst
Martin Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Limit to ~A (all) does it for me.
>
> Or why not to . (a dot)?
> Fewer keystrokes :-)
As I understand it, Mutt internally translates the search pattern "."
into "~A", so they are one and the same.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equ
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I recently moved to maildir/Evolution, but Evolution is still somewhat
> unstable. So I finally got around to be a Mutt user. I have to say
> it's love at first sight.
>
> One thing I haven't figured out yet is how to speed up the opening
> of very
At 6:12 AM EST on March 17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent off:
> I recently moved to maildir/Evolution, but Evolution is still
>
> One thing I haven't figured out yet is how to speed up the opening of
> very large mailboxes. My debian-users mailbox contains some 3500
> messages. It takes about 60 second
This one time, at band camp, MuttER wrote:
> >
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe
>
> And YOU, of course, will never request aid on this list, or present a
> query someone else thinks is inappropriate/unnecessary. I HOPE.
That was a
* Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-17-02 08:31]:
> This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > very large mailboxes. My debian-users mailbox contains some 3500
> > messages. It takes about 60 seconds to open.
> >
> > Are there any tricks to speed this up, some caching mec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> very large mailboxes. My debian-users mailbox contains some 3500
> messages. It takes about 60 seconds to open.
>
> Are there any tricks to speed this up, some caching mechanism or
> somethi
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:12:41PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Are there any tricks to speed this up, some caching mechanism or
> something. I'm already using ReiserFS and maildir.
>
Oops. sorry, about that. I read the manual but I forgot to
google. I'll try the maildir cache patch
(ht
I recently moved to maildir/Evolution, but Evolution is still
somewhat unstable. So I finally got around to be a Mutt user. I have
to say it's love at first sight.
One thing I haven't figured out yet is how to speed up the opening of
very large mailboxes. My debian-users mailbox contains some 350
29 matches
Mail list logo
