Re: running mutt behind a firewall

2002-04-21 Thread Sven Guckes
* Russell Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-21 23:09]: > Hey mutt users, I'm putting this question to > the list for a friend. (Let me know if any more > info is needed for help with answers/suggestions): > > How can I configure mutt to communicate directly > with a POP server and SMTP server o

Re: running mutt behind a firewall

2002-04-21 Thread dan radom
You can also set "my_hdr From:" and "set envelope_from" and not have to mess with sendmail. It doesn't need to be listening for connections to send mail. It will invoke itself when needed. If you can send mail through your firewall, so can sendmail. dan * Russell Hoover ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: running mutt behind a firewall

2002-04-21 Thread Gary Johnson
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:08:45PM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote: > Hey mutt users, I'm putting this question to the list for a friend. > (Let me know if any more info is needed for help > with answers/suggestions): > > How can I configure mutt to communicate directly with a POP server > and SMTP s

Re: running mutt behind a firewall

2002-04-21 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! Russell Hoover spake thus: > Hey mutt users, I'm putting this question to the list for a friend. Suuure ;) > How can I configure mutt to communicate directly with a POP server > and SMTP server outside of my local network. Use sSMTP (dunno about pop, though). sSMTP is monkeywork t

running mutt behind a firewall

2002-04-21 Thread Russell Hoover
Hey mutt users, I'm putting this question to the list for a friend. (Let me know if any more info is needed for help with answers/suggestions): How can I configure mutt to communicate directly with a POP server and SMTP server outside of my local network. I'm running Linux behind a firewall and

Re: Writing a memo to myself -> echo memo | mutt $USER

2002-04-21 Thread David T-G
Dan, et al -- ...and then Dan Lowe said... % % Previously, Sven Guckes wrote: % > % > CTRL-Z suspends mutt. % > echo memo | mutt $USER % > CTRl-D leaves shell % > done :-) % % I think you meant 'fg' instead of ^D... depending on the shell, ^D will Yeah, this is a mix of suspend-and-then-fg an

Please confirm your message

2002-04-21 Thread David Collantes
Your e-mail message with the subject of: "Test" is being held because your address was not recognized. To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message to the following address, or use your mailer's "Reply" feature. [EMAIL PROTECTED] This confirmation verifies that your

Re: ugly thread tree display

2002-04-21 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 09:45:29PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus: > > telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said. > > I disagree. /usr/bin/ssh beats both of them ;) ssh (usually) doesn't do terminal emulation. -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://in

Re: ugly thread tree display

2002-04-21 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:37:05AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Alain Bench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-14 21:57]: > > I use mutt in 3 ways: > > ... > > - running remotely on a Linux box, Mutt started from Cygwin thru it's > > own /bin/telnet.exe (again in a Bash session inside a cmd.exe window

Re: macro: mark all new as read (was: toggle-read)

2002-04-21 Thread Im Eunjea
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-21 04:35]: [...] > > copy+paste from vim? > > anyway - this can be wrong if 'T' means > something else than .. :-( > > the following is a little longer - but should work > even when the keys are bound to other commands: > > macro index \Cr \ > "

Re: Strange Error while starting Editor

2002-04-21 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-21 05:16]: >* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-14 21:13]: >> >Since I use Mutt 1.5.0, NEdit occasionally >> >displays a number of error dialogs which say: >> >Can't open macro file /etc/profile:ulimit:15: value exceeds hard >> >limit