Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command

2002-07-24 Thread John P Verel
On 07/24/02 22:11 +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > To summarize: Mutt will delete any X-Mailer header. Confirmed. Thanks.

Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command

2002-07-24 Thread Sven Guckes
* Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-24 20:45]: > > I assume that if you do no specifically "unignore" X-* lines > > then they will be weeded out. > > > > let's test this: > > > > $ mutt -f mutt.testmail > > :unignore x- > > > > > > bingo - X-Test: line *included*! :-) > > That does

Re: gpg-decryption produces "^M"s

2002-07-24 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Peter T. Abplanalp [02-07-24 21:28:27 +0200] wrote: > heck, i don't know. it all depends on why he wants to > remove the ^M's. I guess most likely because it looks ugly... Another solution could be trying to color it out (with the internal pager). bye, Rocco

Re: how does simple commenting work

2002-07-24 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Sven Guckes [02-07-24 21:28:34 +0200] wrote: > * Erika Pacholleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-24 15:33]: > > Any help appreciated. > > -- > > Erika Pacholleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > mutters: insert vowels of last name > no fsking way! welcome to my killfile. *plonk* Wow, this mail ha

Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command

2002-07-24 Thread Michael Tatge
> I assume that if you do no specifically "unignore" X-* lines > then they will be weeded out. > > let's test this: > > $ mutt -f mutt.testmail > :unignore x- > > > bingo - X-Test: line *included*! :-) That does not work with x-mailer sven. Why didn't you test the header in question? M

Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command

2002-07-24 Thread Sven Guckes
* John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-24 20:03]: > On 07/24/02 21:12 +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > > resending takes the message as is. > > no hooks or whatever get applied. > > feature. period. > Not to be difficult, but to quote the on-line manual: > > 'With resend-message.. Note that the

Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command

2002-07-24 Thread Michael Tatge
John P Verel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > 'With resend-message, mutt takes the current message as a template for > a new message. This function is best described as "recall from > arbitrary folders". It can conveniently be used to forward MIME > messages while preserving the original ma

Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command

2002-07-24 Thread John P Verel
On 07/24/02 21:12 +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > > resending takes the message as is. > no hooks or whatever get applied. > feature. period. Not to be difficult, but to quote the on-line manual: 'With resend-message, mutt takes the current message as a template for a new message. This function

Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command

2002-07-24 Thread Sven Guckes
* John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-24 14:54]: > When I resend a message, using esc e, I find that my > X-Mailer header is not picked up from the original message. > The manual indicates that weeding is used when resending. .. > What obvious thing am I missing? resending takes the messag

Re: how does simple commenting work

2002-07-24 Thread Sven Guckes
* Erika Pacholleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-24 15:33]: > Suppose I have a text which may begin with [ \t]+ > blahblah > blahblah > > and I need to define a special comment marker like "note1" > blahblah > note1 no blahblah > note1 use blub instead > blahblah > > and further I want

Re: gpg-decryption produces "^M"s

2002-07-24 Thread Heiko Heil
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 11:01:44AM -0600, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote: > [...] > for example (untested): > > set pgp_decrypt_command="gpg --passphrase-fd 0 --no-verbose --batch > --output - %f | sed 's/^M//'" Nice idea! I've tried this before, but my attempts were without success... The principal f

View OpenOffice Documents inline

2002-07-24 Thread Andy Spiegl
Does anyone know a tool to view the text parts of StarOffice/OpenOffice documents? I finally convinced my windows buddies to switch from MickySoft, but now my mutt-setup is incomplete. :-) Thanks, Andy. -- http://peru.spiegl.de Our project http://radiomaranon.org.pe Radio

Re: gpg-decryption produces "^M"s

2002-07-24 Thread Peter T. Abplanalp
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 08:05:01PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > * Peter T. Abplanalp [02-07-24 19:55:29 +0200] wrote: > > > for example (untested): > > > set pgp_decrypt_command="gpg --passphrase-fd 0 --no-verbose --batch > > --output - %f | sed 's/^M//'" > > (sed 's/ $//' is much bette

Re: gpg-decryption produces "^M"s

2002-07-24 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Peter T. Abplanalp [02-07-24 19:55:29 +0200] wrote: > for example (untested): > set pgp_decrypt_command="gpg --passphrase-fd 0 --no-verbose --batch > --output - %f | sed 's/^M//'" (sed 's/ $//' is much better) Hmm, what happens with signed and encrypted mail? If GnuPG does decryption an

Re: how to fcc my gpg/pgp-mails UNencrypted?

2002-07-24 Thread Andy Spiegl
Hi Viktor and Rocco, Viktor wrote: > can't help you with your question, however, I always encrypt messages > with the recipient's key and with my own key. Yep, that's how I do it, too. :-) > This way, the encrypted messages is stored in my fcc folder, but I'm > still able to read it, because it'

Re: how does simple commenting work

2002-07-24 Thread John P Verel
Under :help comments there is this: 'comments' 'com'string (default "s1:/*,mb:*,ex:*/,://,b:#,:%,:XCOMM,n:>,fb:-") local to buffer {not in Vi} {not available when compiled without the |+commen

Re: gpg-decryption produces "^M"s

2002-07-24 Thread Peter T. Abplanalp
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 05:08:09PM +0200, Heiko Heil wrote: > Hello Mutt-users, > > a friend of mine uses Outlook :-( in order to write me encrypted > GnuPG E-Mails... a common problem. i have it as well and have, as yet, been unable to solve it. :-) > Everytime (after pressing ESC-P) i get th

how does simple commenting work

2002-07-24 Thread Erika Pacholleck
Now I spent a whole day in searching all my .vim files, reading all through the :help stuff and used my mailarchive to get a clue - either I am missing simply a part of the whole puzzle or I am just too to understand. Supposed I have a text which may begin with [ \t]+ blahblah blahblah and

Re: 1.0.7 ldap problems

2002-07-24 Thread Nico Schottelius
Kirill Miazine [Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 02:16:11PM +0200]: > You sent this to the wrong list, no? 1.0.7 looks like a GnuPG version. sorry guys! I was so tired...Definitly choosed the wrong list! Still have a nice day! Nico -- Please send your messages pgp-signed and/or pgp-encrypted (don't encry

gpg-decryption produces "^M"s

2002-07-24 Thread Heiko Heil
Hello Mutt-users, a friend of mine uses Outlook :-( in order to write me encrypted GnuPG E-Mails... -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) - GPGOE 0.4.1 [...] Everytime (after pressing ESC-P) i get the decrypted mail with "^M"s at the end of each line (carriage return

X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command

2002-07-24 Thread John P Verel
When I resend a message, using esc e, I find that my X-Mailer header is not picked up from the original message. The manual indicates that weeding is used when resending. My .muttrc contains: ignore unignorefrom: subject to cc mail-followup-to \ date x-mailer x-url we

Re: how to fcc my gpg/pgp-mails UNencrypted?

2002-07-24 Thread Gregor Zattler
Hi Viktor, * Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [24. Jul. 2002]: > David T-G wrote: > > ...and then Phil Gregory said... > > % encrypt-to > > % > > % to your ~/.gnupg/options file. This leaves them encrypted on disk but > > % still allows you to go back and look at them. > > > > ... and all

1.0.7 ldap problems

2002-07-24 Thread Nico Schottelius
Hello! Did not find any problem in the mailing list archive, so I am writing to you. Tried to compiled it, but got the attached ldap error. I had a look into ldap.h, which is correct. Can somebody point out where exactly the problem is why gnupg does not compile? I also attached ldap.h (just to