At 10:27 AM EDT on October 16 PeterKorman sent off:
> In a perfect world, I think I'd want to know only
> if the signature did *NOT* check out against the
> keyserver copy.
IMHO, that would weaken the point of crypto signatures. First, most*
signature failures are innocent, being due to MTA ma
Brian C. Hill wrote:
> This doesn't quite work.
>
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] default
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] if replying to a message addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] if original addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * etc.
>
> I know there is some as
Brian C. Hill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> This doesn't quite work.
>
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] default
set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] if replying to a message addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] if original addressed to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *
This doesn't quite work.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] default
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] if replying to a message addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] if original addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* etc.
I know there is some aspect of the send-hook func
Christoph Kampe wrote:
> Is there a way to get rid of the "Please press a key" message after
> executing the macro?
unset wait_key
* Christoph Kampe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-17 01:16 +0200]:
> I took the macro from Alain some threads before, to fetch mail by one
> keypress.
> Like this:
> macro index "" "!fetchmail &\r"
> macro pager "" "!fetchmail &\r"
> macro browser "" "!fetchmail &\r"
>
> Is there a way to get rid of
Hello Mutt Users,
I took the macro from Alain some threads before, to fetch mail by one
keypress.
Like this:
macro index "" "!fetchmail &\r"
macro pager "" "!fetchmail &\r"
macro browser "" "!fetchmail &\r"
Is there a way to get rid of the "Please press a key" message after
executing the macro?
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:35:01PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> * PeterKorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-10-2002 16:30]:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 03:02:31PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> > > * Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-10-2002 14:52]:
> > >
> > > [about PGP signatures]
> > >
> >
* PeterKorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-10-2002 16:30]:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 03:02:31PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> > * Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-10-2002 14:52]:
> >
> > [about PGP signatures]
> >
> > > Or to hide it unless specifically called?
> >
> > unset pgp_verify_sig
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, PeterKorman wrote:
> This is *really* nice. I saw the page at http://w3m.org a
> few months ago. I wrongly concluded that there was no on-going
> development since the date on w3m.org is:
>
> Tuesday August 01, 2000 02:43 P
>
> Your reference to http://w3m.sf.net cleared my c
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:18:23PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Viktor Lakics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-05 12:21]:
> > Has anyone ever tried to work out how to autoview graphics inside mutt?
> >
> > To illustrate the point look at this screenshot:
> > http://lakics.homelinux.net/screenshot/sho
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 03:02:31PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> * Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-10-2002 14:52]:
>
> [about PGP signatures]
>
> > Or to hide it unless specifically called?
>
> unset pgp_verify_sig
>
> --
> René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> T
* Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-10-2002 14:52]:
[about PGP signatures]
> Or to hide it unless specifically called?
unset pgp_verify_sig
--
René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
There is a definite parallel between shots of tequila and a woman's breasts.
One is n
[I know it might have bad security consequences, but I really don't
like to see most of my screen eaten by the outout of GPG checking PGP
signatures.]
Is there a way to display the message "Good signature from..." *after*
the message, not between the headers and the messages? Or to hide it
unless
* Alain Barthélemy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [15-10-2002 20:50]:
> Hello,
>
> Just a Mutt-Newbie question
>
> If I want to run the instruction #> fetchmail -d0 online
> is this line in .muttrc OK
>
> macro pager G "!fetchmail -d0\r"
Why not try it? What is there to screw up?
Your signature
http://www.angio.net/misc/mail.html says the following:
Why use IMAP locally? If you refile messages between mail
folders directly using Mutt, you'll store invalid X-UID headers
into the wrong mail folders. When you then check your mail with
IMAP, the IMAP server w
16 matches
Mail list logo