I did use '-F /dev/null'. They are my company's linux boxes, and it's
quite difficult to request system administrators to install a new
version of mutt.
Thanks,
Derek
-Original Message-
> I'm using Mutt 1.4.1i (2003-03-19). Maybe there is a bug regarding
> EMAIL variable in this versio
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:19:20AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I did use '-F /dev/null'. They are my company's linux boxes, and it's
> quite difficult to request system administrators to install a new
> version of mutt.
You might be able to convince them to upgrade, since Mutt 1.4.1 has a
fe
The other day I had to reinstall my Debian install on my laptop
(Partitioning and no batteries don't mix well) and I've been
configuring everything back to the way it was previously.
Only one thing is really bothering me though; Whenever I am on the
index looking at all of my messages, the name w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, April 18 at 09:05 PM, quoth Michael Pobega:
>Only one thing is really bothering me though; Whenever I am on the
>index looking at all of my messages, the name where it is sent from is
>(For example) "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" instead of the actu
* On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 Michael Pobega ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> Only one thing is really bothering me though; Whenever I am on the
> index looking at all of my messages, the name where it is sent from is
> (For example) "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" instead of the actual
> person who sent the message.
