Re: Problem with new 'pager_format'

* On 2007.06.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Gary Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With mutt-1.5.16, that behavior has changed. The fixed indicator > has been replaced by the "%> -- (%P)" format sequence in > 'pager_format'. The problem with this is that the percentage > indicato

Re: Problem with new 'pager_format'

On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 05:20:53PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > Is there a 'pager_format' that will restore the previous behavior, > that is, keep this indicator fixed at the right end of the status > line while allowing the rest of the status string to "breath" and > the screen width to vary?

Invalid domain name

Hi, I am using 1.5.16 (2007-06-09), and I've been experiencing the same problem since I began to use this devel version. I am using the built-in SMTP. When I try to send an email changing the 'From', for example, using this sendhook: send-hook "~C gimp" 'unset hostname ; set signature= ;

Problem with new 'pager_format'

In mutt-1.5.15, and all prior versions that I know of, the pager status line included a "percentage of the message shown" indicator on the far right. The rest of the status line was always truncated so that that indicator was always visible. With mutt-1.5.16, that behavior has changed. The fi

ignore-thread

Hi, I'm looking for something like gmail's "mute" or the ignore-thread patch shown on this page: http://wiki.mutt.org/?PatchList (the link for ignore-thread seems to be dead, btw). Did I miss something or is this not implemented? Thanks, -- Cristóbal Palmer ibiblio.org systems administrator

Mime-Problem

Hi Users, can anyone help me of setting mutt-mime-support correct. I have a "usualy" installed debian etch and all works fine. The only thing is, if anyone send me a mail with a word (.doc) attachment, then mutt show the following: Content-Type: \012- application/msword; name="File.doc" I think

Re: Mutt or muttng?

On 27.06.2007 (22:43), Alexander Dahl wrote: >> So far, I've been using mutt-ng, but today I figured I would try out vanilla >> mutt -- for no particular reason, other than to try out the newest >> relase. > >You seem to use mutt 1.5.15 but 1.5.16 is newest release. 8-) You're right; I do want tha

Re: Mutt or muttng?

> So far, I've been using mutt-ng, but today I figured I would try out vanilla > mutt -- for no particular reason, other than to try out the newest > relase. You seem to use mutt 1.5.15 but 1.5.16 is newest release. 8-) Greets Alex -- * http://www.lespocky.de ***

Re: Mutt or muttng?

=- Eyolf Oestrem wrote on Wed 27.Jun'07 at 22:22:39 +0200 -= > a designated trash folder, > a reminder for forgotten attachments; There are macro solutions on the wiki. > an option to reply to the list and not the original sender; use "lists" + "subscribe" with list-reply for lists, set reply-t

Mutt or muttng?

So far, I've been using mutt-ng, but today I figured I would try out vanilla mutt -- for no particular reason, other than to try out the newest relase. I got an error message, notifying me that the following variables are unknown: trash list_reply abort_noattach attach_remind_regexp strip_was max

Re: size in kbytes instead of bytes in folder_format ?

=- Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino wrote on Wed 27.Jun'07 at 19:04:13 +0200 -= > do you know if there is a way to show the size of the folders in KB > instead of Bytes (without patching the sources ;) ? Ugrade to 1.5.16 > I suppose I'm not allowed to do arithmetic operations in > $folder_format, Am I?

size in kbytes instead of bytes in folder_format ?

Hi mutters, do you know if there is a way to show the size of the folders in KB instead of Bytes (without patching the sources ;) ? Sometimes it's hard to understand if a mailbox is big 1MB or 10MB. I suppose I'm not allowed to do arithmetic operations in $folder_format, Am I? Cheers, -- Alessio