A question about macros, how to handle user input (if possible)?

2007-08-07 Thread Chris G
Is it possible to have a macro which asks for user input in the middle and then continues the macro? E.g. I want a macro which does something, then does a s[ave] command (to which the user responds) and then does some more things after the save. If it's not possible then I think it's something th

Delete messages based on size of maildir

2007-08-07 Thread John K Masters
I am fairly new to Mutt and probably going about this in totally the wrong way but I have set up muttrc to delete messages after a certain score has been reached. Some messages never get deleted due to adding to the scores but most mail-list messages get deleted after 3 months. However, some lists

Re: A question about macros, how to handle user input (if

2007-08-07 Thread Rado S
=- Chris G wrote on Tue 7.Aug'07 at 19:07:16 +0100 -= > Is it possible to have a macro which asks for user input in the > middle and then continues the macro? > > E.g. I want a macro which does something, then does a s[ave] > command (to which the user responds) and then does some more > things

Re: Delete messages based on size of maildir

2007-08-07 Thread Rado S
=- John K Masters wrote on Tue 7.Aug'07 at 19:30:32 +0100 -= > I am fairly new to Mutt and probably going about this in totally > the wrong way but I have set up muttrc to delete messages after a > certain score has been reached. Some messages never get deleted > due to adding to the scores but m

Re: Delete messages based on size of maildir

2007-08-07 Thread John K Masters
On 20:52 Tue 07 Aug , Rado S wrote: > =- John K Masters wrote on Tue 7.Aug'07 at 19:30:32 +0100 -= > > > I am fairly new to Mutt and probably going about this in totally > > the wrong way but I have set up muttrc to delete messages after a > > certain score has been reached. Some messages nev

Re: Delete messages based on size of maildir

2007-08-07 Thread Rado S
=- John K Masters wrote on Tue 7.Aug'07 at 20:16:41 +0100 -= > Sorry, didn't explain fully. Yes I can score on to: or cc: but can > I for example score according to the number of messages in a > mailbox? For boxes that get 5 mails per month - no problem, keep > them all. For ones with 150 per day

Re: A question about macros, how to handle user input (if

2007-08-07 Thread Chris G
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 08:49:30PM +0200, Rado S wrote: > =- Chris G wrote on Tue 7.Aug'07 at 19:07:16 +0100 -= > > > Is it possible to have a macro which asks for user input in the > > middle and then continues the macro? > > > > E.g. I want a macro which does something, then does a s[ave] > >

Re: Delete messages based on size of maildir

2007-08-07 Thread Christian Kuka
Thus wrote Rado S ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [07.08.07 21:40]: > =- John K Masters wrote on Tue 7.Aug'07 at 20:16:41 +0100 -= > > > Sorry, didn't explain fully. Yes I can score on to: or cc: but can > > I for example score according to the number of messages in a > > mailbox? For boxes that get 5 mails

Re: A question about macros, how to handle user input (if

2007-08-07 Thread David Champion
> > > E.g. I want a macro which does something, then does a s[ave] > > > command (to which the user responds) and then does some more > > > things after the save. This is not a complete or flawless answer, just a quick example of one way to do this. And it's untested. macro index = "source 'mutt

Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?

2007-08-07 Thread Chris G
In the MuttFaq it says:- You can recompile Mutt with the --buffy-size option to "configure". ... but there isn't a --buffy-size option to 1.5.16, has it been removed or what? -- Chris Green

Re: Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?

2007-08-07 Thread Chris G
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:05:38PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > In the MuttFaq it says:- > > You can recompile Mutt with the --buffy-size option to > "configure". > > ... but there isn't a --buffy-size option to 1.5.16, has it been > removed or what? > ... oops, a quick Google reveals that th

Re: Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?

2007-08-07 Thread Brendan Cully
On Tuesday, 07 August 2007 at 22:05, Chris G wrote: > In the MuttFaq it says:- > > You can recompile Mutt with the --buffy-size option to > "configure". > > ... but there isn't a --buffy-size option to 1.5.16, has it been > removed or what? It's now a muttrc variable, $check_mbox_size.

Re: Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?

2007-08-07 Thread Chris G
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:18:32PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > On Tuesday, 07 August 2007 at 22:05, Chris G wrote: > > In the MuttFaq it says:- > > > > You can recompile Mutt with the --buffy-size option to > > "configure". > > > > ... but there isn't a --buffy-size option to 1.5.16, ha

quoted-printable query ...

2007-08-07 Thread Cameron Simpson
I'm using mutt-1.5.16 with the softfill patch and receiving email from a Microsoft Exchange V6.5 user and mutt is displaying "^M" at the end of each line. This is unexpected. Example: Hi Cameron,^M ^M I am not using a display_filter (and even so, would have expected it to apply after QP decod