Re: which version of mutt?

2007-08-11 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, August 11 at 08:39 PM, quoth Kyle Wheeler: > The sidebar patch was considered and rejected (as-is, however to my > knowledge the door was left open for the developer to improve it and > resubmit, though given the history and apparently s

Re: which version of mutt?

2007-08-11 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, August 11 at 08:25 AM, quoth Gary Funck: > I notice that many of the contributors to the list use version 1.5, > while FC5 version I'm using is 1.4. 1.5 is the development branch, 1.4 is stable. But 1.5 is much cooler. :) > I've also

Re: which version of mutt?

2007-08-11 Thread tannhauser
On Sa, 11.08, 08:42, Gary Funck wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:34:17PM +0200, tannhauser wrote: > > Well, you know the mutt vs. patches thing, do you? > I've just begun to use mutt more as my main e-mail program, > preferring its simplicity to some of the more whiz-bang > GUI mail readers. S

Re: which version of mutt?

2007-08-11 Thread Gary Funck
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:34:17PM +0200, tannhauser wrote: > On Sa, 11.08, 08:25, Gary Funck wrote: [...] > Well, you know the mutt vs. patches thing, do you? I've just begun to use mutt more as my main e-mail program, preferring its simplicity to some of the more whiz-bang GUI mail readers. So,

Re: which version of mutt?

2007-08-11 Thread tannhauser
On Sa, 11.08, 08:25, Gary Funck wrote: > I notice that many of the contributors to the list use > version 1.5, while FC5 version I'm using is 1.4. > I've also read about mutt-ng (next generation), which > seems to have many 1.5 enhancements as well as other > features such as a side panel for fold

which version of mutt?

2007-08-11 Thread Gary Funck
I notice that many of the contributors to the list use version 1.5, while FC5 version I'm using is 1.4. I've also read about mutt-ng (next generation), which seems to have many 1.5 enhancements as well as other features such as a side panel for folders. Are there plans integrate mutt-ng features

Re: Question(s) about folder-hook

2007-08-11 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, August 11 at 11:57 AM, quoth Chris G: >Do the commands hooked by folder-hook get executed as the selected >folder is opened, i.e. just before the folder index is displayed? Is >this the *only* time folder-hook gets executed? Yup. >Is the

Re: send-hook read recipients list form a file

2007-08-11 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, August 11 at 12:09 PM, quoth Eric Smith: >Is this possible as I have a long list and multiple send-hooks? Sorta... Like this: send-hook "~r `cat file`" ~Kyle - -- You never truly understand a thing until you can explain it to your

readonly IMAP mailboxes

2007-08-11 Thread Florian Unglaub
Hello, today I played a little bit with my Dovecot Imap server. I noticed a feature that allows Dovecot to store mails in gziped mboxes by using an Imap plugin (zlib_plugin). I frequently create archives of some large imap maildirs with archivemail, which stores mails in gziped mboxes. I can view

Question(s) about folder-hook

2007-08-11 Thread Chris G
It's not absolutely clear from TFM when folder-hook gets executed (well it's not clear to me anyway). Do the commands hooked by folder-hook get executed as the selected folder is opened, i.e. just before the folder index is displayed? Is this the *only* time folder-hook gets executed? Is the name

send-hook read recipients list form a file

2007-08-11 Thread Eric Smith
Is this possible as I have a long list and multiple send-hooks? -- Eric Smith