Hi Patrick!
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Andrew Diederich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-22-08 21:49]:
Is there a way for mutt to tell me what values I've set, or what values
are default? For example, in postfix if I use postconf -n it tells
me what values I've set.
mutt
After re-sourcing my config, all the colouring and similar stuff
I do in folder_hooks is overwritten. Is it somehow possible to rerun
all applicable hooks as part of the resourcing?
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
seen on an advertising for an elaborate swiss men's
Hi,
I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out how
to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in the
directory in which an attachment is saved. I assume there's some
option to autodelete these folders?
--
Tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 23 at 02:20 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex:
mmm, i liked the idea of this folder-hook so i tried it out.
Is it meant to automagically delete duplicate threads ? If so
the following folder-hook did sweet-fa for me :(
sweet-fa? That's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 23 at 10:58 AM, quoth martin f krafft:
After re-sourcing my config, all the colouring and similar stuff
I do in folder_hooks is overwritten. Is it somehow possible to rerun
all applicable hooks as part of the resourcing?
0n Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 08:19:27AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Tuesday, September 23 at 02:20 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex:
mmm, i liked the idea of this folder-hook so i tried it out.
Is it meant to automagically delete duplicate threads ? If so
the following folder-hook did
=- Tim Chown wrote on Tue 23.Sep'08 at 10:31:27 +0100 -=
I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out
how to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in
the directory in which an attachment is saved. I assume there's
some option to autodelete these folders?
Of course one should always check the manual and try a web search
before asking for help. This is a given, and I don't think there's any
argument.
It's not always easy to find what you're looking for in the manual, and
it's not always straightforward to construct a search query that yields
what
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 04:08:35PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
=- Tim Chown wrote on Tue 23.Sep'08 at 10:31:27 +0100 -=
I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out
how to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in
the directory in which an attachment is
=- Pau wrote on Tue 23.Sep'08 at 7:55:23 +0200 -=
but sometimes find it difficult to look for the information,
because a specific keyword is needed... then asking in the mailing
list (as I did yesterday) is the only left option.
The type of question matters.
I ask for apologies in advance,
=- Tim Chown wrote on Tue 23.Sep'08 at 15:57:47 +0100 -=
Scan mutt-dev archive for this topic to understand origin, problems
and workarounds.
Hmm, well the Yahoo view of mtt devs mails doesn't throw up
anything obvious. I think 'folder', 'attachment', 'save' are too
generic a term to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 23 at 10:31 AM, quoth Tim Chown:
I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out how
to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in the
directory in which an attachment is saved. I assume
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 23 at 05:10 PM, quoth Rado S:
For me it was related to NFS, and it was about tmpdir/tmpfile
generation. Lookout for posts by me, I suggested a patch to revert
the newly introduced behaviour.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:28:33AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/changeset/c0e6d2617984/
~Kyle
- --
If an elderly respected expert in a given field tells you that
something can be done he is almost certainly right. If an elderly
respected expert in a given field
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:54:19AM -0400, Jeff Kinz wrote:
And if an elderly respected expert in a given field tells you
RTFM, don't whine about it. RTFM advice is not (usually) an insult
or an attempt to be nasty. Its usually valid and ALWAYS a good
idea.
On the other hand, some people who
Quoting Derek Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
No matter how much I love it, Mutt's configuration is intricate and
complicated in the extreme;
You haven't tried configuring Sendmail, have you? ;-)
*SCNR*
-Sndr.
--
| Did you hear about the cat that ate a ball of wool? -- It got mittens.
|
* Sander Smeenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-23 19:35]:
Quoting Derek Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
No matter how much I love it, Mutt's configuration is intricate and
complicated in the extreme;
You haven't tried configuring Sendmail, have you? ;-)
For a change you could have a look at fvwm
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:33:31PM +0200, Sander Smeenk wrote:
Quoting Derek Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
No matter how much I love it, Mutt's configuration is intricate and
complicated in the extreme;
You haven't tried configuring Sendmail, have you? ;-)
As a matter of fact, being a
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:43:25AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
What's the trouble? Let people ask questions honestly and politely,
but if all you have to give is rtfm, with no reference or citation or
vague hint at a substantive answer, then don't bother replying -- or at
least keep it out
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:59:37PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Andrew Diederich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-22-08 21:49]:
Is there a way for mutt to tell me what values I've set, or what values
are default? For example, in postfix if I use postconf -n it tells
me what values I've set.
20 matches
Mail list logo
