correct usage of my_ vars

2009-02-05 Thread Louis-David Mitterrand
Hi, I have several spam reporting macros like this one: macro index,pager Se "set nocopy noautoedit nomime_fwd editor=/bin/truesp...@ebay.comphishing attempt reportset copy autoedit nomime_fwd editor=\"vim +'/^$'\"" "SPAM REPORT" To avoid repeating the same 'set' and 'unset' commands

sidebar patch for 1.5.19

2009-02-05 Thread Andrey Zhidenkov
Is there a sidebar patch for 1.5.19 version? Where can I get it? Thank you.

Re: Signature for new mail/no signature for replies

2009-02-05 Thread Paul E Condon
The signature text is stored in a file named .signature in your home directory. Edit the file with your favorite text editor. Some things about UNIX mail really don't need fixing. On 2009-02-05_18:15:27, Michael Williams wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to append my signature to new emails (essentia

Re: mboxes and maildirs in .muttrc

2009-02-05 Thread sigi
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 06:17:14PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > [...] Another > notable difference is in new mail notification and mailbox switching. > Mutt's maildir implementation is better at remembering that you have > new mail than its mbox implementation is... The mbox implementation > "for

Re: local sendmail

2009-02-05 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* JP Bruns [02-05-09 10:07]: > Patrick [05.Feb.2009 15:19]: > >* Patrick Shanahan [02-05-09 09:08]: > >> > >>No, you do not *need* postfix, but your MDA *must* deliver to procmail > >>in some manner. You may process the mail with procmail: > >> formail -ds procmail -m > >> formail -ds procma

Signature for new mail/no signature for replies

2009-02-05 Thread Michael Williams
Hi, I would like to append my signature to new emails (essentially those I start by hitting 'm' in the pager or message view) but do not want a signature for replies (either individual, group, or list replies). I know how to unset signature with a reply hook, but I can't figure out how t

Re: local sendmail

2009-02-05 Thread JP Bruns
Patrick [05.Feb.2009 15:19]: * Patrick Shanahan [02-05-09 09:08]: No, you do not *need* postfix, but your MDA *must* deliver to procmail in some manner. You may process the mail with procmail: formail -ds procmail -m formail -ds procmail The crux is that the MDA *must* deliver to p

Re: local sendmail

2009-02-05 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Patrick Shanahan [02-05-09 09:08]: > > No, you do not *need* postfix, but your MDA *must* deliver to procmail > in some manner. You may process the mail with procmail: > formail -ds procmail -m > formail -ds procmail > > The crux is that the MDA *must* deliver to procmail. > On fur

Re: local sendmail

2009-02-05 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* JP Bruns [02-05-09 08:39]: > > I also found 'mailutils', a package including 'mail.local' (GNU > mail.local -- the local MDA) which might already help you taking care of > any local or system mailing. It didnt really suit my needs so I will try > to get a small script done myself, but it might

Re: local sendmail

2009-02-05 Thread JP Bruns
Anders [05.Feb.2009 10:42]: * bill lam [20090205 10:06]: On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Anders Rayner-Karlsson wrote: > Does not work. Tried it today, and you only get a mbox that is not a > real mbox. You can edit it by hand, inserting a blank line between the It works for me. I use maildir i

Re: local sendmail

2009-02-05 Thread Anders Rayner-Karlsson
* bill lam [20090205 10:06]: > On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Anders Rayner-Karlsson wrote: > > Does not work. Tried it today, and you only get a mbox that is not a > > real mbox. You can edit it by hand, inserting a blank line between the > > It works for me. I use maildir instead

Re: local sendmail

2009-02-05 Thread bill lam
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Anders Rayner-Karlsson wrote: > Does not work. Tried it today, and you only get a mbox that is not a > real mbox. You can edit it by hand, inserting a blank line between the It works for me. I use maildir instead of mbox if it matters -- regards, ===

Re: local sendmail

2009-02-05 Thread Anders Rayner-Karlsson
* Javier Rojas [20090205 04:57]: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 09:53:03AM -0500, Aron Griffis wrote: > > emailj...@gmx.de wrote: [Wed Feb 04 2009, 09:38:07AM EST] > > > Is there some other way around this other than having to run postfix? > > > > I haven't use