Re: How to cope with a mailing list that uses two addresses?

2009-08-07 Thread Chris G
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:44:46PM +0100, Chris G wrote: The 'harvesting script' is my own, written in python so is easy enough to change. I'll think about this idea too, thanks. That was the right way to go, a fairly simple change to the script that produces my 'lists' and 'subscribe'

Re: send-hook built to fail? [Was: Re: send2-hook not working for

2009-08-07 Thread Erik Christiansen
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:14:04PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Friday, August 7 at 01:52 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen: Consider if you were instead changing the Subject header. For example: send-hook '~C d...@example.com' 'my_hdr Subject: [dudemail]' Munging that a bit, I seem to be

Re: send-hook built to fail? [Was: Re: send2-hook not working for

2009-08-07 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Friday, August 7 at 08:09 PM, quoth Erik Christiansen: On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:14:04PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Friday, August 7 at 01:52 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen: Consider if you were instead changing the Subject header. For

UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Alexander Dahl
Hi there, up to today I had just one signature file in the plain old place ~/.signature which I edited on the system I used mutt. For my other mail clients I have a bunch of different signature files in a VCS to use the same files with different clients (actually several instances of Mozilla

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread lee
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 03:52:10PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: 24 feffAlexander Dahl, Staff Engineer This is the same signature you should see below and you should also find this special character in it. Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not seeing a

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Alexander Dahl
Hi, Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not seeing a special character in the signature. Why should it not be? At least it corrupts the correct signature coloring in my mutt. Haven't tried this with other mail clients yet. As to where it comes from, the character

Re: send-hook built to fail? [Was: Re: send2-hook not working for

2009-08-07 Thread Erik Christiansen
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 07:21:22AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Friday, August 7 at 08:09 PM, quoth Erik Christiansen: Hmmm. I think there must be a misunderstanding between us somewhere here. If you're happy, that's great, and nevermind the rest. But unless I misunderstand how mutt works,

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 08:11:58AM -0600, lee wrote: Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not seeing a special character in the signature. Yes, it's just that this one has zero width and there mutt ignores it (as it does for 0x200b). Rocco

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: As to where it comes from, the character is in the signature file. I wouldn't expect the MUA to remove characters from the signature file. Not in general, but this one is special. ;-) Not from mutt's view. Why is it

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Alexander Dahl
Hi, The do it... :) In mutt, you can even set $signature to a pipe, i.e. a script that gets the signature as argument and prints it with BOM: set signature=script.sh signature| That's what I did now, wrote a script strip-bom.pl which removes the BOM from the beginning of the signature

Re: send-hook built to fail? [Was: Re: send2-hook not working for

2009-08-07 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Saturday, August 8 at 01:55 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen: Well, I've gone back for the third time, to check what happens on compose (m), and list reply (L). In my now disused cross-gcc mailbox, with no send-hook and no Reply-To: in the test