Re: temporarily modifying thread display in the index?

2013-01-10 Thread Will Fiveash
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 06:54:13PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:50:12PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > > On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 18:45, Will Fiveash wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:20:12PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at

Re: temporarily modifying thread display in the index?

2013-01-10 Thread Will Fiveash
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:50:12PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 18:45, Will Fiveash wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:20:12PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > > > On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 17:47, Will Fiveash wrote: > > > > Occasionally I'm involved in a very

Re: temporarily modifying thread display in the index?

2013-01-10 Thread Will Fiveash
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:13:06AM +, Christian Ebert wrote: > * Will Fiveash on Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 17:47:21 -0600 > > Occasionally I'm involved in a very long e-mail thread such that the > > threading indicators are beyond the width of my terminal window. What > > I'd like is a way

Re: temporarily modifying thread display in the index?

2013-01-10 Thread Brendan Cully
On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 18:45, Will Fiveash wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:20:12PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > > On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 17:47, Will Fiveash wrote: > > > Occasionally I'm involved in a very long e-mail thread such that the > > > threading indicators are beyond

Re: temporarily modifying thread display in the index?

2013-01-10 Thread Will Fiveash
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:20:12PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 17:47, Will Fiveash wrote: > > Occasionally I'm involved in a very long e-mail thread such that the > > threading indicators are beyond the width of my terminal window. What > > I'd like is a way to te

Re: temporarily modifying thread display in the index?

2013-01-10 Thread Brendan Cully
On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 17:47, Will Fiveash wrote: > Occasionally I'm involved in a very long e-mail thread such that the > threading indicators are beyond the width of my terminal window. What > I'd like is a way to temporarily "pull in" a subthread so I can see the > threading. To put i

Re: temporarily modifying thread display in the index?

2013-01-10 Thread Michael Elkins
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:13:06AM +, Christian Ebert wrote: set narrow_tree That is the only option that controls the width of the tree. The alternative would be some macros that to change $index_format to make the subject field wider.

Re: temporarily modifying thread display in the index?

2013-01-10 Thread Christian Ebert
* Will Fiveash on Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 17:47:21 -0600 > Occasionally I'm involved in a very long e-mail thread such that the > threading indicators are beyond the width of my terminal window. What > I'd like is a way to temporarily "pull in" a subthread so I can see the > threading. To p

temporarily modifying thread display in the index?

2013-01-10 Thread Will Fiveash
Occasionally I'm involved in a very long e-mail thread such that the threading indicators are beyond the width of my terminal window. What I'd like is a way to temporarily "pull in" a subthread so I can see the threading. To put it another way, make some message that's the parent of a subthread l

Re: index macros don't work when current mailbox empty

2013-01-10 Thread Michael Elkins
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:04:02PM +0100, Marco wrote: when the current mailbox is empty my index macros don't work. When I press the corresponding shortcut mutt displays “There are no messages”. Is that a bug or a misconfiguration in my muttrc? If your macros contain an operation on a message

index macros don't work when current mailbox empty

2013-01-10 Thread Marco
Hi, when the current mailbox is empty my index macros don't work. When I press the corresponding shortcut mutt displays “There are no messages”. Is that a bug or a misconfiguration in my muttrc? Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: can not get mail from mail list which are send by myself

2013-01-10 Thread Jim Graham
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 05:56:15PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2013-01-10, Jim Graham wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:57:03AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:59:22PM -0600, Jim Graham wrote: > >> [snip] > >> > Btw, port 587 is one of those that I said are used

Re: Question about PGP and mutt

2013-01-10 Thread Dale A. Raby
Well, there is almost certainly more than one way to do it... Dale -- "Think nobody intercepts email? Think again! Gnu Privacy Guard. Not just for spies." signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Question about PGP and mutt

2013-01-10 Thread Robert Holtzman
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 07:33:16AM -0600, Dale A. Raby wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:37:54PM +0100, Andreas Hanke wrote: > > Hello together, > > > > I have a question about PGP and mutt! > > > > gpg2 works fine on my system, I have already tested that. > > > > In my .muttrc I have that add

Re: can not get mail from mail list which are send by myself

2013-01-10 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2013-01-10, Jim Graham wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:57:03AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:59:22PM -0600, Jim Graham wrote: >> [snip] >> > Btw, port 587 is one of those that I said are used for authentication, >> > as opposed to port 25 which is UNauthenticated.

Re: can not get mail from mail list which are send by myself

2013-01-10 Thread Jim Graham
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:57:03AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:59:22PM -0600, Jim Graham wrote: > [snip] > > Btw, port 587 is one of those that I said are used for authentication, > > as opposed to port 25 which is UNauthenticated. > > See the SMTP AUTH verb. Anything

Re: can not get mail from mail list which are send by myself

2013-01-10 Thread Mark H. Wood
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:59:22PM -0600, Jim Graham wrote: [snip] > Btw, port 587 is one of those that I said are used for authentication, > as opposed to port 25 which is UNauthenticated. See the SMTP AUTH verb. Anything you can do on those oddball ports, you can do on port 25. An SMTP host wi

Re: Question about PGP and mutt

2013-01-10 Thread Dale A. Raby
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:37:54PM +0100, Andreas Hanke wrote: > Hello together, > > I have a question about PGP and mutt! > > gpg2 works fine on my system, I have already tested that. > > In my .muttrc I have that added: > > /opt/mutt-1.5.21/contrib/gpg.rc So far as I am aware, you do not rea

Question about PGP and mutt

2013-01-10 Thread Andreas Hanke
Hello together, I have a question about PGP and mutt! gpg2 works fine on my system, I have already tested that. In my .muttrc I have that added: /opt/mutt-1.5.21/contrib/gpg.rc If I send an email to myself and encrypt that message mutt ask my to enter the password and everything works finde.

warning if alias does not expand

2013-01-10 Thread Eric Smith
I only use fully formed email addresses or aliases when addressing mail (and not "local" usernames). I (too frequently) misspell my aliases. Is there a way that mutt could warn me when the alias fails to expand, instead of just appending the hostname to it? -- Eric Smith