when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the 'To:'
header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think there is such
a thing as 'set to = ' in configuration file (correct me if i'm wrong
please). so perhaps a macro?
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:09]:
right now i have:
set record = /dev/null
but i have a feeling that's not the canonical way of doing this. any
suggestions?
use the force, luke
check man muttrc and look for record
--
(paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana,
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:06]:
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
i don't think a folder-hook would do this since
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:27:34PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:09]:
right now i have:
set record = /dev/null
but i have a feeling that's not the canonical way of doing this. any
suggestions?
use the force, luke
check man muttrc
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:06]:
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
i don't think a folder-hook would do this since
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:38]:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:06]:
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
'To:' header by filling it up based on a given
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:41]:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:27:34PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:09]:
right now i have:
set record = /dev/null
but i have a feeling that's not the canonical way of doing this.
starting a thread is the problem. to reply to a mailing list, list-reply
works just fine. but when one wants to start a thread, that's when you need
to skip the 'To:'
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:44:58PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
How are you trying to reply to list? Are you using the L key as
described in the fine manual?
yes. i'm not talking about _reply_, i'm talking about starting a thread.
++ 02/02/14 14:06 -0500 - glphvgacs:
right now i have:
set record = /dev/null
but i have a feeling that's not the canonical way of doing this. any
suggestions?
Untested, but I presume unset record will work.
--
Rejo Zenger . r...@zenger.nl . 0x21DBEFD4 . https://rejo.zenger.nl
GPG encrypted
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:54]:
starting a thread is the problem. to reply to a mailing list, list-reply
works just fine. but when one wants to start a thread, that's when you
need to skip the 'To:'
Then list-reply to an existing thread, and remove the In-Reply-To:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:45:51PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:41]:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:27:34PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:09]:
right now i have:
set record = /dev/null
++ 02/02/14 14:05 -0500 - glphvgacs:
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the 'To:'
header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think there is such
a thing as 'set to = ' in configuration file (correct me if
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 08:53:57PM +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
Untested, but I presume unset record will work.
nice, thanks.
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:01:41PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:54]:
starting a thread is the problem. to reply to a mailing list, list-reply
works just fine. but when one wants to start a thread, that's when you
need to skip the 'To:'
Hi,
What font should I use in xterm to get proper line-drawing chars to
display threads in mutt?
Thanks,
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 15:08]:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:45:51PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:41]:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:27:34PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:57:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:46]:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:06]:
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 09:00:56PM +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
++ 02/02/14 14:05 -0500 - glphvgacs:
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the 'To:'
header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think there is
* Louis-David Mitterrand vindex+lists-mutt-us...@apartia.org [02-02-14 15:19]:
What font should I use in xterm to get proper line-drawing chars to
display threads in mutt?
I would say to use any that contain those chars as all do not, but your
problem may be more related to charset than the
* Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com [02-02-14 15:30]:
* Louis-David Mitterrand vindex+lists-mutt-us...@apartia.org [02-02-14
15:19]:
What font should I use in xterm to get proper line-drawing chars to
display threads in mutt?
I would say to use any that contain those chars as all do
is that swapped or what?
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:27:51PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Louis-David Mitterrand vindex+lists-mutt-us...@apartia.org [02-02-14
15:19]:
What font should I use in xterm to get proper line-drawing chars to
display threads in mutt?
I would say to use any that contain those chars as
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:57:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:46]:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [02-02-14 14:06]:
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [2014-02-02 14:28 -0600]:
++ 02/02/14 14:05 -0500 - glphvgacs:
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
is there a way to add the '\n' there?
I didn't find a way to add
On 2014-02-02, glphvgacs wrote:
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the 'To:'
header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think there is such
a thing as 'set to = ' in configuration file (correct me if
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 05:45:54PM -0600, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [2014-02-02 14:28 -0600]:
++ 02/02/14 14:05 -0500 - glphvgacs:
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
'To:' header by filling it up based on a given
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [2014-02-02 18:25 -0600]:
now that is what i'm talking about. great stuff, thanks.
You're welcome.
and this to hooks:
folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
set autoedit=yes
my_hdr To:'
folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
my_hdr
* glphvgacs darwinsker...@gmail.com [2014-02-02 18:25 -0600]:
and this to hooks:
folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
set autoedit=yes
my_hdr To:'
folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
my_hdr To:mutt-users@mutt.org'
By the way, you may want to check your hooks thoroughly,
29 matches
Mail list logo
