Xu Wang wrote:
> I would like to have mutt open postponed when I first start mutt. Is
> there a way to do this from the .muttrc? I suppose I could do that
> "push R" trick, but I would prefer a .muttrc solution.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Xu
if a shell solution would do, then:
alias muttp='mutt
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:57:22PM +0100, Tomas Nordin wrote:
> But, how do I call such a command that doesn't have a key-binding. I
> tried `:` and the command `search-opposite` but the `:` seem to be for a
> different set of functions.
:exec your-command
I concur that from within Vim there is not much sense to do it. But
why not from compose map? Should have access to same information as
pager map.
Kind regards,
Xu
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Stephen wrote:
> I tend to just exit Vim, and then hit the right key (in
I tend to just exit Vim, and then hit the right key (in fact, had to
do it right now :P). Never felt it's delayed me enough to see if
there's an alternative approach, although I'd think at that point
there's not (in relation to Mutt) as you're in an external editor with
no direct tie to mutt,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:54 AM, David Champion wrote:
> * On 23 Nov 2015, Xu Wang wrote:
>> I would like to have mutt open postponed when I first start mutt. Is
>> there a way to do this from the .muttrc? I suppose I could do that
>> "push R" trick, but I would prefer a
* On 23 Nov 2015, Xu Wang wrote:
> I would like to have mutt open postponed when I first start mutt. Is
> there a way to do this from the .muttrc? I suppose I could do that
> "push R" trick, but I would prefer a .muttrc solution.
You can put the "push R" into your muttrc.
You can also use "mutt
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 07:15:13PM +, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Tomas Nordin on Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 18:19:48 +0100
> > What do I put in my muttrc to change
> >
> >Recall postponed message? ([yes]/no):
> > to
> >Recall postponed message? (yes/[no]):
> >
> > upon invocation
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:14:18PM +0100, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:42:31PM +0100, Tomas Nordin wrote:
> > Exactly so, thanks, perfect. And while we're on it, now the same for
> > next and previous search hit, like and -. Possible also?
>
> You are aware of contextual