Re: mutt and S/SMIME

2020-06-16 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 07:37:01PM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: I few months ago, I ran into a pgp_sign_as + GPGME related issue: Setting it to a subkey doesn't work. Not using GPGME (and using gpg.rc instead) works. IIRC, that was a GPGME API limitation. Did anything change about that?

Re: mutt and S/SMIME

2020-06-16 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:00:52 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:20:22PM +0100, isdtor wrote: > >Two questions remain now. The first, when using mutt with gpgme, are > >any of the gpg/gpg/certificate/smime related configuration variables > >still relevant? And if so,

Re: mutt and S/SMIME

2020-06-16 Thread isdtor
Kevin J. McCarthy writes: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:20:22PM +0100, isdtor wrote: > >Two questions remain now. The first, when using mutt with gpgme, are > >any of the gpg/gpg/certificate/smime related configuration variables > >still relevant? And if so, which? The question arises from this >