On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 08:43:22PM +0200, ilf wrote:
Do you think I should file a feature request for this in the tracker?
Yes, please go ahead. I don't have a current timeline for starting
master development again, but when I do, it will be good to have the
request there.
Thank you.
--
Do you think I should file a feature request for this in the tracker?
Kevin J. McCarthy:
There seem to be quite a few users with this issue. Do you think a
boolean option like "crypt_verify_smime" that explicitly works even
with GPGME would be feasible? From a user POV, it sure sounds
logical
Hi.
Cameron Simpson (12023-07-31):
> Yes. For something to run lateryou would need to quote them (to defer their
> interpretation). But it won't help with save-hook because it does not,
> itself, run a command.
Thanks for confirming what I suspected.
> I take it that you can't easily express
Dear Jakub,
Jakub Jindra via Mutt-users (2023/07/31 08:50 +0200):
> I remember replying to a similar post on Unix Stackexchange in the past:
> https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/554369/85046
That sounds like a very cool starting point, thanks!
AIUI it uses MSMTP as an intermediate queuing system.
Hello Sébastian,
I remember replying to a similar post on Unix Stackexchange in the past:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/554369/85046
Best,
JJ
On 2023-07-29 12:07, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to be able to respond to emails quickly to have it done but
defer the actual
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 03:59:57PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
Hi.
I want to use an external command to decide in what mailbox to save
messages.
When I hit ‘s’ with its default action of save-message, mutt asks
“Save to mailbox ('?' for list): =ml/debian”, with the default being
chosen from
