Hi Matthias,
On 2024-05-21 07:45, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Our Library Management System sends mails to patrons and media vendors
> which are assembled in a shell script with all data (Subject, body, To,
> attachments, etc) by a call to the MUA mutt 2.1.1 which pipes the mail
> to send
Matthias Apitz (12024-05-21):
> How could we expand this for signing mails on the fly?
Hi.
For fine control, I would suggest:
- Build your mail entirely yourself without relying on a MUA like mutt
and inject it directly into the MTA local injector /usr/lib/sendmail.
- Ditch GPG. GPG has been
El día martes, mayo 21, 2024 a las 10:49:08a. m. +0200, Nicolas George escribió:
> Matthias Apitz (12024-05-21):
> > How could we expand this for signing mails on the fly?
>
> Hi.
>
> ...
>
> - Ditch GPG. GPG has been increasingly incapable of deciding if it is a
> high-level tool or a low-le
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 05:57:00PM GMT, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> The problem with any automation, anyway if with GnuPG or not, is how
> to enter the passphrase or PIN to get access to the private key.
Does the gpg-agent help with that? It is supposed to, I think.
--
Ian
Matthias Apitz (12024-05-21):
> I do use GnuPG based on OpenPGP SIM cards even in my Linux telephone
> (Pusim L5) for crypting files, ~350 passwords (password-store) and SSH
> connections (the RSA secret is on the OpenPGP card). All works fine and
> gives access to the secrets by entering a 6 digit
googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org (12024-05-21):
> > The problem with any automation, anyway if with GnuPG or not, is how
> > to enter the passphrase or PIN to get access to the private key.
> Does the gpg-agent help with that? It is supposed to, I think.
Makes it worse. Without gpg-agent, your aut
