Hi Dave!
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Dave Pearson wrote:
>
> Obviously the best method of dealing with this is to implement a solution,
Ack. But before reinventing something, it seems always
advisible to check if there's alreay a solution. Finally,
this can be accomplished by a discussing the problem
Hi Dirk!
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Dirk Ruediger wrote:
> > Mail/mutt-users [Msgs:413 New:18 1.1M]
> > Mail/sf/vuln-dev [Msgs:141478K]
> > Mail/nymip [Msgs:54 368K]
> >
> > now wouldn't that be nice ?
>
> This implies that mutt scans all folders with new mail (at
Hi Heinrich!
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> how about this ?
>
> Mail/mutt-users [Msgs:413 New:18 1.1M]
> Mail/sf/vuln-dev [Msgs:141478K]
> Mail/nymip [Msgs:54 368K]
>
> now wouldn't that be nice ?
There's a patch available on Brandon Long's
Hi Conor!
* Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010118 09:37]:
> OTOH, I did a little script that checks for "attach" style keywords in
> your message and then checks for a "content disposition attachment" type
> line in the message and if it doesn't find one, pop's up an xmessage to
> ask if you wa
