Re: muttzilla

2000-02-09 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:18:24PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote: > If anyone out there is using muttzilla, is their a way to have an email > open in alternative Xterm, like Konsole, or rxvt? Muttzilla? I just searched www.google.com and www.altavista.com for it but did not find anything. Where do

Re: Printing

2000-01-31 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 11:22:40PM +, Thomas Ribbrock wrote: > > the page, I've resolved it somewhat, but not completely. Any suggestions > > or ideas that I can be pointed out would be great. Thanks. > > I'm using "enscript", which is an ASCII to Postscript converter. It can > prettyprint a

Re: Colour via telnet/ssh

2000-01-18 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 03:14:21PM +, Chris Green wrote: > I'm using mutt on this system (x-1.net) via an ssh connection from a > Sun workstation. It works fine except for colour. I have mutt > running on the Sun locally with colour working OK and have copied the > commands across. > > I h

Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes

2000-01-13 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 05:15:01PM +0300, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > Mikko H?nninen wrote: > > Nick Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 12 Jan 2000: > > > Argh! I despise procmail, yes its powerfull, and can do alot, but > > > it's severly anoying. > > ... > > > yes procmail is powerfull, bu

Re: slightly off topic: reformatting rude mail

1999-12-03 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 02:29:36PM -0600, Timothy Ball wrote: > Anyone got a way to reformat mail so that it's <80 cols? I figured this > was a common problem and someone would have a pre-made solution. > I use 'par' as my parameter formatting tool, which is very fancy and does all the jobs you

Re: using LDAP

1999-08-20 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 02:06:25PM -0600, Dale Harris wrote: > It would seem the decision on feature bloat was left a long, long time > ago. Colors for example, if that ain't feature bloat, then I don't what is. > So I don't see how more could hurt. Face it if you have two different > commands

Re: using LDAP

1999-08-20 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 01:32:09PM -0600, Dale Harris wrote: > I've got the LDAP stuff working, I believe. I'm able to use Q to query for > for e-mail addresses. That works great to just find someone and send them > a note. But something that would be nice (especially when I'm feeling > lazy a

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-15 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 04:26:33PM -0400, John Franklin wrote: > > Is there a support graphic a la "Netscape NOW!" that people could put > on their home pages? I didn't see anything on the mutt.org site. > Then again, I didn't see ANY graphics on the mutt.org site. > > 88x31 seems to be a commo

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-14 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 04:49:04PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > > I get the impression, though, that a lot of "the faithful" don't read /. > much since the s/n ratio got so bad. Most of the comments seem to be > newbies. The informal survey of mail headers done a while back by someone > on th

Re: Problem with mutt-0.96.3i

1999-07-14 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 05:43:12PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: > > I don't suppose anyone is interested in the problem of why the > keymap-defs.h file wasn't built automatically? At least _i_ am interested in it since I tried to build mutt-0.95.6-3 from the Debian sources (unstable) and had exa

Re: filter question

1999-06-03 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 02:36:51PM -0500, Jeff Rankin wrote: > Is there anyway to have mutt provide some sort of filtering of mail > messages in my inbox to a separate folder based on user-defined > criteria? I am using mutt via IMAP and am evaluating it's ability to > let users filter or sort ma

FYI: newsbody WAS: current message in shell command

1999-04-11 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Mon, Apr 12, 1999 at 02:06:36AM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote: > Where newsbody is a small program which strips quoted lines before > passing them to ispell. (I forgot where i got it) http://www.image.dk/~byrial/newsbody/newsbody-0.1.3.tar.gz (Though i can't believe this is the best s

current message in shell command

1999-04-11 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
Hi. It would be fine if you guys could save me a bit from reading too much into "manual.txt" ;-). I have keyboard macro which calls the German ispell via a shell command and i don't know how to pass the current temporary mutt file where the actual message relies in (and no, the pipe command doe

Re: Switching to mutt

1999-03-15 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:12:58PM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > BTW, doesn't Majordomo generate X-Mailing-List: entries in the > > header? I use procmail to copy everything from coming from a > > mailing list to the appropriate +inbox.. However > > Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i have

Re: Switching to mutt

1999-03-15 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 10:53:14PM +1100, Russ Pitman wrote: > Ok as above, now could let me know what has to be done to get mutt to see > my mail. mutt looks in /var/spool/mail/rjpp which is always empty. > I use procmail to stash the incoming in ~/mail/INBOX,etc,etc,etc. > Would m

Re: ispell handling

1999-03-13 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 09:10:53AM +0100, Byrial Jensen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 12:21:05 -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > > Vikas Agnihotri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > If you are using a non-standard ispell which does NOT > > > accept '-x', you can always 'set ispell=/path/to/isp

ispell handling

1999-03-12 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
Hi. I encountered a problem with ispell handling of mutt. Ispell is called with -x flag (compose.c). -x Don't create a backup file. However, if you use an ispell which deletes backup files by default you don't have this flag anymore - and makes this ispell unusable :-(. Wouldn't it

ispell handling

1999-03-12 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
Hi. I encountered a problem with ispell handling of mutt. Ispell is called with -x flag (compose.c). -x Don't create a backup file. However, if you use an ispell which deletes backup files by default you don't have this flag anymore - and makes this ispell unusable :-(. Wouldn't it