I know 'a' adds an alias for the current sender, but is there any other
more generic way to add alias _and_ make it effective immediately? I can
start an editor to edit my .mutt/alias but I can't see the changes until
restarting mutt.
Thanks.
--
Jing Xue
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:41:15PM -0800, William Yardley wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:06:52PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
> > * Jing Xue on Sunday, February 04, 2007 at 12:16:11 -0500:
>
> > > I know 'a' adds an alias for the current sender, but is there a
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 11:36:16AM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Sunday 2007-02-04 12:16:11 -0500, Jing Xue muttered:
> > I know 'a' adds an alias for the current sender, but is there any other
> > more generic way to add alias _and_ make it effective immedi
become useful.
Now _I_ don't use these mail receipts, nor do _I_ like getting them,
because of the annoyance factor. But then I respect it when others
request one - at least before they start abusing it.
My 2 cents.
--
Jing Xue
*: that's real enough for me. YMMV.
technical level.
The reason I got involved in this debate is because I can't agree that
a tool should decide whether a feature is socially appropriate or not
for its users.
That, and maybe I'm just in the mood for philosophical argument these days.
Cheers.
--
Jing Xue
Quoting Rado S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
=- Jing Xue wrote on Wed 17.Oct'07 at 12:17:08 -0400 -=
The point here is, people and groups of people operate vastly
differently, often in ways that we never think of.
So why should an MUA be so morally judgmental?
If nobody does, where s
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:42:06PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
> =- Jing Xue wrote on Wed 17.Oct'07 at 16:07:28 -0400 -=
> >
> > Because coders are supposed to code solutions into a tool, not to
> > code their ideology into it. (well as far as software tools are
> > concer
