On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:04:09PM +0200, Jens John wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 01:51:36PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > Currently, on Debian, my muttprint seems to work with Perl
> > 5.26.1. Can you tell me what the problem you are facing might be?
>
> Debian's versi
ternative written
> maybe in python?
Currently, on Debian, my muttprint seems to work with Perl
5.26.1. Can you tell me what the problem you are facing might be?
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
tation conventions to mutt's code?
> I don't think you need upstream mutt's cooperation with that.
Good idea, but the patch is applied before the debian/rules commands
are executed. The method you suggest would change the code while
debian/rules runs, which is after the patches have been applied.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
with
the server.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
Dear Ed,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 05:23:38PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:27:47PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Often, I wish to know the time at which someone wrote me an e-mail
converted to the local time zone. Since most of my contacts live in
another time zone
Dear Gary,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:26:17AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2012-03-30, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear Mutt Users,
Often, I wish to know the time at which someone wrote me an e-mail
converted to the local time zone. Since most of my contacts live in
another time zone
and not
if I use Mutt as an IMAP agent. I can live with this solution, but I
was wondering if you could come up with a better solution than this.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
background?
xterm, since it's fast, slick, and no-nonsense (for me. May not hold
for others). And, I always prefer a dark background since I believe
it's easier on my eyes.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
Dear Mutt users,
I am facing a strange issue with Mutt 1.5.20. The earlier practice to
attach files from the command line would be:
mutt -a file1 -a file2 -a file3 myfri...@somewhere -s Documents you required
However, in Mutt 1.5.20, it appears that even the e-mail address above
is treated as a
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I am facing a strange issue with Mutt 1.5.20. The earlier practice to
attach files from the command line would be:
mutt -a file1 -a file2 -a file3 myfri...@somewhere -s Documents you
required
However, in Mutt 1.5.20, it
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Wednesday, June 17 at 09:28 AM, quoth Kyle Wheeler:
According to the mutt man page, the usage pattern line you're looking
for is this one:
mutt [-nx] [-e cmd] [-F file] [-H file] [-i file] [-s subj]
[-b addr] [-c addr]
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Monday, March 2 at 11:54 AM, quoth Ravi Uday:
how to make mutt ask for pwd each time you send email ?
maybe once every 10 mails or based on a timer
Ask for a pwd? Mutt can't even *change* its pwd (without a patch).
Why would you want
with for
several months. Thanks!!!
Glad to know I was of help. :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
through procmail. I
know this is not a valid solution, but this worked around the issue
for me.
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
mail
editor will display the full message to you with the headers. The
easiest way to achieve your goal would be to scrap the In-Reply-To
header. You can, of course, edit the subject.
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
is delivered)
procmail delivers to $DEFAULT, not $MAILDIR
Right. I overlooked this point. Thanks for pointing this out.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
missing ...?
Try this:
MAILDIR=$HOME/Email/Mailbox
:0:
Inbox
And call just procmail. But, as said, this is a Mutt list, but I
couldn't resist suggesting.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
interface in firefox, which is mutt alike...
I think a better means would be to use cygwin and somehow get getmail
or fetchmail to POP/IMAP your mail, though I speak without knowing the
situation in your office.
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:34:25PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
[snip]
And sorry for Cc'ing the list. I pressed `g' instead of `L' by
mistake. :-(
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
mutt inbox.
I think getmail marks messages as read once you receive them. In fact,
it may so have happened that of your 582 messages, only 417 were new
(unread), but getmail's claim to have delivered everything beats me.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology
? Using XTerm's Backarrow Key
fixes this, but it breaks all other apps, like emacs -nw, break.
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
is is:
:-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:22:10AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
You do not give enough information, but a guess: You are running a
mail notification program.
I think you're right. I'll try to find out which program it is that
reads my mboxes.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:56:11PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear Mutt Users,
My Mutt is 1.5.13. I have no issues with it, except that all of my
incoming mail (to my mboxes) are flagged as O instead of N. And
when I read them, they are marked as read and it's all right. But why
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:12:29PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Sorry, I realized that I had nomark_old set. Hence the problem.
But that wasn't the issue. All my incoming mails (delivered by
procmail to my mboxes) are marked O. What else could the reason be?
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462
26 matches
Mail list logo
