local addresses (ones without the
�...@host” portion) with the value of $hostname. If unset, no addresses
will be qualified.
--
Sahil Tandon
jk...@kinz.org wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 01:33:47PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > jkinz mentioned the connecting "system"; that is to say, the connecting
> > client. That client needn't be the MX for the domain from which email
> > is arriving.
>
zirath wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2008-12-27, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>
>>> jk...@kinz.org wrote:
>>>
>>>>> [...] you do not need an MX record to send or receive mail.
>>>>>
>>>> True, but many emai
ran a mail server, I would have guessed that 5-10%
> of servers required that the sending domain have an MX record.
5-10%. Sounds like the exception rather than the rule or "requirement"
:-)
--
Sahil Tandon
Anders Rayner-Karlsson wrote:
> To "require" a MX to point back to the sending host before accepting
> mail is IMHO disingenious. If it causes legit e-mail to disappear -
> it's bad.
Thank you, this is *precisely* my point. :-)
--
Sahil Tandon
jk...@kinz.org wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:22:08AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > bill lam wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, David Maus wrote:
> > > > So you *could* set up such software on your box that does the
> > > > delivery but y
e blacklisted.
This is false; you do not need an MX record to send or receive mail.
--
Sahil Tandon
current copy, and how do I stay current on it?
> >
>
> port install mutt-devel
>
> That will get you 1.5.18
>
> In general, I think that you will find that macports packages are better
> maintained than fink.
+1 for this advice. MacPorts are, in my experience, far superior to
Fink.
--
Sahil Tandon
et
speculation. And please remove that horrendous sig.
[...]
--
Sahil Tandon
in your best interest to antagonize Patrick and other helpful
members of the mutt community. He *was* trying to help you. Have you
ever chanced upon the phrase:
âGive a man a fish, heâll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and heâll
eat for a lifetime.â
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
u can relay via pair.com SMTP
servers from the office is because pair associates your work IP with your
pair account.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ter. Just setup the sasl_passwd file and make the
requisite entries in your main.cf. And as Kyle mentioned, Postfix is not
always running by default on OS X. It "wakes up" to send messages when
called by mutt via the sendmail command and then shuts back down after
attempting to send the message.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e that file for clues, assuming mutt is (via the sendmail command)
passing mails to Postfix.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> later just copy the msg stored under /tmp/mutt* and have it mailed in
> windows !!
> Is there a workaround to solve this often network-error i see.
Check the logs and find out why this error occurs and fix the actual problem.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
header" -- I'm trying to clean out
> as much old cruft as possible from my .procmailrc, so I took that recipe
> out. Doing a imit in the mutt-users list on "gbnet" revealed a single
> message from six years ago.
Why not place all email addressed to mutt-users@ (regardless of the domain
name) in your mutt mailbox?
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
, as I
already mentioned, that particular address does *not* direct email to this
list. You will get a bounce directing you to send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t;
> Is anyone aware if this address is still in any way active for the list?
It is no longer active. Users who send email to that address are asked, via
a bounce, to direct email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ace to start:
http://tinyurl.com/6eg5lm.
Procmail help can be had at http://www.procmail.org/ and their mailing lists:
http://www.procmail.org/era/lists.html
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David Vinnicombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to use gpg with mutt.
[...]
Before going any further, read:
http://www.mutt.org/doc/PGP-Notes.txt
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
main.com". So I'm a bit
> concerned here that it's not working right.
Sending your password in PLAIN over an encrypted transport (i.e. SSL/TLS) is
OK.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
xt && file manual.txt
manual.txt: ASCII English text
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uldn't find
> that option.
>
>
> After doing some digging on the relevant web site, e.g.
> http://wiki.mutt.org/?PatchList, I guessed that the option
> "file_charset" maybe be replaced by "attach_charset".
>
> Am I right?
I believe so. Search for 'c
onger need
> to use my local sendmail for smart-relay anymore ?
Correct.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nificantly slower when I use Terminal.app than if I use xterm/rxvt
> over Apple's X11.
I run Mutt 1.5.17 via Terminal.app (on Leopard) with no such speed
issues. I installed via macports.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hat the distribution
> > guesses you might want.
>
> Would you please explain more what is the "user driver" way to achive
that?
Read the manual linked above and set your mailcap as you wish.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
25 matches
Mail list logo
