Re: mutt && oauth2 config

Matthias Apitz wrote: > The page about how to configure mutt with oauth2 support says: > > https://www.vanormondt.net/~peter/blog/2021-03-16-mutt-office365-mfa.html > ... > > Edit the python script and insert your GPG identity in the > "ENCRYPTION_PIPE" construct. > Add client id ('08162

Re: dynamic sig based off imap folder

Hi, void wrote: > I have various mailing list emails filtered on the server > by the mail provider going into various imap folders, based > on various properties of the email, like List-Id: for example. > > What I'd like to have within mutt is for it to dynamically > decide which signature file t

Re: Forwarding a false positive classified message

Hi, Kai Weber wrote: > From time to time I have to report a falsly classified > message to my mail provider so that they can adjust their > filters. I am looking for a way to automate that: > > 1. Forward selected mail as attachement to x...@foo.com > 2. Set Subject to "reporting false positive -

Re: Avoiding S/MIME

Hi, Jan Eden wrote: > my configuration sets a PGP default key: > > set pgp_default_key = ... > > and outgoing messages are signed accordingly. But every time I reply > to a message signed using S/MIME, mutt tries to add an S/MIME signature, > too (which fails, as there is no S/MIME key available

Re: How do I see the text/html version of an email?

José María Mateos wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 02:56:35PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >> Some considerate organisation has been sending me MIME mails with >> content in a text/html section and a wholly blank text/plain version. >> What I see in mutt is the blank text/plain. Who on Earth thoug

Re: Identifying messages with no To: or CC: headers?

Tim Chase wrote: > On 2022-09-02 19:45, Sam Kuper wrote: >> Could you not prepend your EXPR with something like this? >> >> `^(Delivered|Envelope)-To:\ ` > > Ah, so the pattern for matching ~h includes the header-name then > and the regex can match against that? That should work. > > However

Re: macro does not work when mailbox opened read-only

Fourhundred Thecat wrote: > I am using mutt in 2 modes: > > 1) mutt -R -f folder > 2) mutt-f folder > > In case 1), pressing "q" should simply exit. This is read-only mode and > there are no messages to be deleted. > > In case 2), pressing "q" should exit while also automatically deletin

Re: remove restriction on line length in mutt compose

Globe Trotter via Mutt-users wrote: > ... Fedora 33 (my favorite distribution, which however, > has not updated mutt for aeons) As an aside, perhaps you haven't checked in a few weeks? Fedora has mutt-2.0.5 in both the stable 32 & 33 releases. But as Remco said, this is most likely your editor se

Re: Patch [was Re: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11]

Hi, felixs wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:11:34PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:20:54PM +0100, felixs wrote: >>> I tried to access the branch with the patch, but the access is >>> password-protected. >> >> The repo is clonable via

Re: muttrc for different mutt versions

Claus Assmann wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018, Kai Weber wrote: > >> How can I have the same muttrc on both machines without running into >> errors during mutt start? > > I split the rc file into > 1) a common part > 2) parts specific to the mutt version > and > - source the common part (1) in the

Re: Option to disable S/MIME signature check?

Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:40:38AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: >> Is there an option in mutt to do this? Hopefully a run time >> option, not a compile time option... > > The compile-time configuration is the cleanest way to turn it off. > However, you could try set s

Re: Mail-Followup-To (was Re: breaking long header lines into 2 (or more) lines)

Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día miércoles, abril 25, 2018 a las 08:56:26p. m. +0200, Matthias Apitz > escribió: > >> El día miércoles, abril 25, 2018 a las 02:46:06p. m. -0400, Patrick Shanahan >> escribió: >> >>> then you have someone in your system makeing changes to your posts, >> >> the 'sy

Re: Remove Subject prefixing (when answering/forwarding) possible?

Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Tuesday, February 27, 2018 a las 10:39:53AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt > escribió: >> I'm using: >> >> # Erase [ext] tags from e-mails >> subjectrx '\[ext\] *' '%L%R' >> >> to remove the tag "optically". Is there any way of removing the >> Subject: prefix when answeri

Re: configure: error: could not find sasl lib

Cameron Simpson wrote: >> Another interesting thing is that although mutt doesn't finally send the >> mail, msmtp reports it as sent. I mean that in the sent file of msmtp you can >> find: > > The tail of your message from this point seems to be missing. Perhaps you're reading this from an mbox a

Re: Possible to not leave pager if up on first or down on last message?

Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 14:14:38 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> I think you want the pager_stop? variable: >> >> 3.169. pager_stop >> >> Type: boolean >> Default: no >> >> When set, the internal-pager will

Re: Possible to not leave pager if up on first or down on last message?

Hi Scott, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > When I'm in the pager and on the first message, if I accidentally press > it takes me to the index, with a message of "You are on the first > message". This makes sense, but I would prefer to stay in the pager. > Similarly for pressing on the last messsage, I w

Re: mutt feeds more to gnupg than it needs, causes invisible/lost

I sometimes see TOFU on lists where the sender is replying to a message that was signed using traditional (inline) PGP. Their message does not show up once check-traditional-pgp is called. Only the original text from the quoted PGP signed section is displayed. I don't think mutt has always behav

Re: mutt feeds more to gnupg than it needs, causes invisible/lost

martin f krafft wrote: > The actual problem remains though. For some reason, the last message > I sent was inline *and* PGP-mime signed, thus this one is simpler to > exemplify the problem. > > There's a bit of text preceding the "Hello," up top of this mail, > but if you configured mutt with pgp_a

Re: couldn't save certificate

bill lam wrote: > Not sure if this is useful to you. I use debian and install its > ca-certificates package, and add the following line inside my > ~/.muttrc > > set ssl_ca_certificates_file=/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt I think that may be just what Dale needs. On Fedora, the path to the ca

Re: F1 - key-binding trapped

Michael Tatge wrote: > * On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 11:46AM +0200 Jan-Herbert Damm (jan-h-d...@web.de) > muttered: >> this .muttrc entry (in my /etc/Muttrc): >> >> macro generic,pager " less /[...]/doc/mutt/manual.txt >> >> seems to be trapped by Gnome somehow. F1 (from within mutt) starts >> the gnom

Re: Header weeding for message/rfc822 parts in 1.5.20

Rocco Rutte wrote: > Thanks, this is fixed now in hg tip -- sorry for the breakage. Thank you Rocco for the very quick fix and all the other work you've done. :) -- ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp

Re: Header weeding for message/rfc822 parts in 1.5.20

Brendan Cully wrote: > That was an accident. Would you mind filing a bug at bugs.mutt.org? Done: http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3265 Thanks Brendan! -- ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~

Header weeding for message/rfc822 parts in 1.5.20

I noticed after updating to 1.5.20 that headers were not weeded when displaying message/rfc822 parts in a message. This appears to be due to changeset 536771b4e085¹. I'm wondering if there is any particular work-around for this, or if it's an unintentional side-effect. I see it mainly when deali

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released

Gerard Robin wrote: > Did you make a debian package ? > If yes, can you show your file control ? Why not just check out the Debian package files from http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-mutt/mutt.git;a=summary ? -- ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~

Re: Threading with IMAP folders

Kyle Wheeler wrote: > My bet would be that "!" was intended as a shortcut to be used when > changing folders (e.g. "c!"), and its implications as far as hooks go > weren't considered. FWIW, I use 'folder-hook "!" ...' in my mutt config for a few things and it works well. So it's not generally b

Re: Gnupg2 vs gnupg

Kyle Wheeler wrote: > I've recently started looking into gpg-agent again, because it seems > the redraw issues that used to plague pinentry calls have been > resolved. I think there may still be one or two. I found one a few months back and submitted a patch, but since then I've run into a simila

Re: clearsign not working

Chris Lemire wrote: > Hello, I'd like to have gpg with --clearsign working and the text to > be in the message, not as an attachment. I tried all of these before > sending an email, i for inline, c for clearsign, and s for sign. "c" isn't for clearsign, it's to clear the pgp flags that might curre

Re: Change unread mark without open the message

Michael Kjorling wrote: > The easy way that I can think of to do what the OP wants is to tag > the messages (`t'), then use (`;'), (`W') > or (`w'), and then make the desired change. I've used a macro like this for a while: macro index ,n "~N\nN~T\n" \ "Mark all messages as read

Re: more verbose "Enter passphrase: " line?

tannhauser wrote: > i have various email accounts and various gpg key pairs. When i get > an encrypted email, mutt just outputs "Enter passphrase: ", without > giving any hint for which secret key. As long as i decrypt specific > emails, that behaviour is ok: i know which key pair i use for that >

Re: downloading and compiling from source

Jamie Griffin wrote: > I'm new to Linux and bought my machine with ubuntu 7.10 this week. > I've been using Mac osx for the last 6 months and so i'm still very > much in the learning stages. Enjoy. :) > I've got a lot of stuff to read to teach myself, but having been > using Mutt on my Mac i wan

Re: Reliable/safe way of removing empty maildirs?

Cameron Simpson wrote: > Yeah, but without even invoking find: > > rmdir dir/new dir/tmp dir/cur dir \ > || mkdir -p dir/new dir/tmp dir/cur > > Robust, safe, trivial. Hooray for simplicity. :) > People always seem to forget that rmdir is perfectly safe, in that > it won't remove empty direct

Re: EMAIL and / or use_from in batch process

William Yardley wrote: > I'm using a command like this to send a bunch of emails out: > % egrep -v "^(#|$)" test_email.txt | sed 's/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:digit:]]*//g' | > while read line ; do mutt -F bogus_muttrc -s 'The Subject' ${line} < > message_text.txt ; done > > Currently, bogus_muttrc has th

Re: unable to use send2-hook / group pattern for automatic

Gregor Zattler wrote: > I configured a group "gpg-full" which matches all emailaddresses to > which a valid gpg key exists in my keyring. I'm able for instance > to search for emails matching %Cgpg-full in the index and the scroll > bar jumps to the next message which is addressed to somebody who'

Re: Spellcheck

Rem P Roberti wrote: > What I expected to be able to do was to invoke the spell checker > directly from within vi, which is no doubt possible, but which so > far eludes me. If your vi is vim >= 7, then you can use the built-in spellchecker in vim. To do this, you type :set spell while in normal m

Re: extract pgp/gpg key

Joseph wrote: > According to manual ^K (ctrl-shift-K) is for "extract-key" > when I tried it, I got: > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. > gpg: Total number processed: 0 > Press any key to continue... > > The message was pgp signed. The keys aren't transmitted with each signed message in t

Re: GPG keyservers

Joseph wrote: > What version are you using? > The one the most stable marked in Gentoo portage: > They have the new one: gnupg-2.0.7 but it has not been marked stable. I still use the 1.4 branch primarily. I've got gnupg-1.4.7. I do use gpg-agent from the gnupg2 branch, currently I've got gnupg2

Re: GPG keyservers

Joseph wrote: > I'm using gnupg-1.9.21 Huh. That's an old version of gnupg2. It may well have the same bug in it that the gnupg 1.x branch had. Try updating your gpg package. > and I tried it both with "0x" and without. > > gpg --interactive --recv-keys ED0E1FB7 > worked but it gives me an

Re: GPG keyservers

Joseph wrote: > That is strange, until I when I try to verify my own submission I > get: key "ED0E1FB7" not found on keyserver > > gpg --search-keys ED0E1FB7 > gpg: searching for "ED0E1FB7" from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net > gpg: key "ED0E1FB7" not found on keyserver What version of gpg do you hav

Re: lists and subscribe commands and the To: header

Kyle Wheeler wrote: > Yes, BUT mutt does *not* use those headers to match against the > lists/subscribed lists for the purposes of ~l and ~u pattern > matching. Check out pattern.c, line 1172; all it uses is h->env->to > and h->env->cc. h->env->to is built (in parse.c) from To and > Apparently-To

Re: lists and subscribe commands and the To: header

Kyle Wheeler wrote: > Now, it's probably fair criticism if you want to say that mutt > should also check List-Post and/or List-ID headers (if they exist), > but for good or ill, it does not currently (file a bug report). > Other than that, though, how do you think mutt *should* identify > messages

Re: gpg: encrypt with more than one key

tannhauser wrote: > the concrete problem: i'm on a (very small) mailinglist. we all have > the gpg keys of the others. i can not encrypt with more than one > key. > so, how do i send emails to the mailinglist address and encrypt it > with the various recipients' keys? > i was very surprised that i

Re: Make of docs and other stuff

Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > I have some comments from the 1.5.15 build. As I found years ago the main > problems are in the make in the doc directory. This is amazingingly > complex, at least to me. It uses tools I have not meet before and I had > to download them from the cygwin site. It failed wit

Re: GPG and good signature (mis?)behaviour

Stefano Sabatini wrote: > I discovered this behaviour is dependant on the folder I'm exploring. > There happens to be "good" folders and "bad" folders, in the good ones > I can see the "s" flag right just when I open them in the index and > the verify mechanism works as expected (that is good signa

Re: GPG and good signature (mis?)behaviour

Stefano Sabatini wrote: > This is my crypto setting: > > # %f: message file > # %s: signature file > # %a: pgp_sign_as value > set pgp_decode_command="gpg %?p? --passphrase-fd 0? --no-verbose --batch > --output - %f" > set pgp_verify_command="gpg --no-verbose --batch --output - --verify %s %f" >

Re: GPG and good signature (mis?)behaviour

Sander Smeenk wrote: > Sorry, but your key is not 'trusted' in my trustdb, yet the 's' in > front of your message changes to an 'S' after reading it. Hmmm, you're right. (I should know better than to post before noon. :) -- ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/p

Re: GPG and good signature (mis?)behaviour

Stefano Sabatini wrote: > Hi mutters, > > I'm getting this strange behaviour when I try to verify the integrity > of a message with mime type multipart/signed and signed with PGP. > > In most cases it works just fine, but in some cases I get something > as: > > [-- PGP output follows (current ti

Re: Is merging threads possible?

Chris G wrote: > Ah, but when is my work machine likely to get upgraded to Fedora 7? > Some time after I retire I suspect (not that long, I'm 60 now!). Well, lucky you then. That's a whole lot less to worry about. :) -- ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ===

Re: Is merging threads possible?

Chris G wrote: > It's really a pity that mutt 'stable' is so old now, it's what gets > delivered on most distributions and means that people trying mutt > won't get to see all the new goodies. > > I got 1.4.2.2 on the following:- > Slackware 11 (home machine) > Fedora Core 6 (work desktop m

Re: Save encrypted-to-self or plain copy of sent message

mal content wrote: > Ah, nice. > > Is there any way to indicate that a message was signed or encrypted > in the cleartext copy? I don't know of one. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that there is, as there is very little that mutt can't do (or be taught to do with a little of the right kinds of

Re: Save encrypted-to-self or plain copy of sent message

mal content wrote: > Currently, when I send a PGP encrypted message to a recipient, it is > encrypted and readable only by them. I'd like to automatically save > a plain copy of the sent message You can use fcc_clear to achieve this. From the manual: 3.53. fcc_clear Type: boolean Default:

Re: reading color quoted replies

Marc Vaillant wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 07:31:38PM +0100, Rado S wrote: [...] >> _You_ have several options: >> 1) educate your eMail partners to quote mutt-friendly (txt-only). [...] > Are you serious about option 1? I would be. Even outlook (not sure about outlook express) can be told to