ugh by /usr/bin/mail to
handle my mail. With enough hooks and help applications, it might
become what mutt is right now: the best mailer [for me, at least].
--
Rutger Nijlunsing, rutger @ null.net - Linux! --
Don't BiCapitalize without extremely good reason: it
e that shouldn't belong in the kernel^H^H^H^H^H^Hmutt.
Just my f0.05.
--
Rutger Nijlunsing, rutger @ null.net - Linux! --
Don't BiCapitalize without extremely good reason: it messes up the natural
human-eyeball search order -- Your Friendly
n a Solaris machine, where all file systems are mounted by NFS.
Is this a mutt problem? Or a Solaris problem? Or something else? How
can I change this behaviour?
Regards,
Rutger.
--
Rutger Nijlunsing, rutger @ null.net - Linux! --
Don't BiCapitalize without
any debug options I can switch on in mutt?
>
> try:
>
> set sendmail=echo
I think
set sendmail=cat
would be more succesful :)
--
Rutger Nijlunsing, rutger @ null.net - Linux! --
Don't BiCapitalize without extremely good reason: it messes up t
this patch instead of my previous one.
>
[snip patch]
Ok, thanks a lot! Things seem to be working perfectly now!
--
Rutger Nijlunsing, rutger @ null.net - Linux! --
Don't BiCapitalize without extremely good reason: it messes up the natural
human-eyeball searc
sendlib.c:1375
> > 1375if ((p = strchr (h->data, ':')))
> > (gdb) print h->data
> > $1 = 0x0
> > (gdb) print h
> > $2 = (LIST *) 0xede68
> > (gdb) print h->next
> > $3 = (struct list_t *) 0xede78
> > (gdb) print *(h->next)
>
next = 0xede88}
(gdb) print *h
$5 = {data = 0x0, next = 0xede78}
(gdb)
I changed if ((p = strchr (h->data, ':'))) to if ((h->data) && (p =
strchr (h->data, ':'))), but this causes a new segfault somewhat later
in the process, which leaves a lockfile for my &
m right now] does not crash on the mailbox
[1.0pre2i also].
This mail is a messages which has been converted by an in-house
utility from a Lotus Notes database document, and I suspect that some
headers are missing / incorrect.
I've got the mailbox attached as file.
--
Rutger Nijlunsing, rutger
