Re: What does check-new in browser menu actually do?

2015-06-18 Thread Ian Zimmerman
At the risk of following up to myself (one foot in internet hell!), having done another little investigation, here's what I found. The code responsible for the check-new command is in browser.c, in functions _mutt_select_file (public) and examine_mailboxes (static). examine_mailboxes ultim

What does check-new in browser menu actually do?

2015-06-13 Thread Ian Zimmerman
x I was in. And lo, many times _immediately_ after doing that I see a "buffy" notification on the bottom telling me about new mail in other mailboxes. So, I have a sneaking suspicion that check-new doesn't do what it's supposed to, or else I quite misunderstand its purpose. I c

folder browser, check-new and all that

2008-02-19 Thread Steve S
Hi all In connection to my earlier postings, I did some more testing and I'm pretty sure that I tracked down a kind of pathological test case to reproduce the issue. I also found that the source of the problem I'm seeing is actually connected to my first post about the check-new funct

Re: $check-new -> TSM problem?

2002-09-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 13:41]: > > > Ah, TSM must be the problem, thanks. > > TSM? > TSM Tivoli Storage Manager > The backup system we use. > Read in the manual that this could be the problem, but now the admin > says that it's not and mutt is compiled the right way on th

Re: $check-new -> TSM problem?

2002-09-26 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 02:28:53PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 09:58]: > > Sven Guckes wrote: > > > don't forget about comp.mail.mutt! > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=mutt+%22new+mail%22&scoring=d > > > > Ah, TSM must be the problem, thanks. >

Re: $check-new -> TSM problem?

2002-09-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 09:58]: > Sven Guckes wrote: > > don't forget about comp.mail.mutt! > > http://www.google.com/search?q=mutt+%22new+mail%22&scoring=d > > Ah, TSM must be the problem, thanks. TSM? http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=exact&Acronym=tsm

Re: $check-new

2002-09-26 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:40:07AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > don't forget about comp.mail.mutt! > http://www.google.com/search?q=mutt+%22new+mail%22&scoring=d Ah, TSM must be the problem, thanks. Johan

Re: $check-new

2002-09-25 Thread Sven Guckes
> > > this to be able to see where I have new mail: bind browser $ > > > check-new Although I'm experienceing some "buggy" behaivor by > > > mutt. Sometimes (I can't see a pattern) it doesn't give the > > > mailbox the "N"

Re: $check-new

2002-09-25 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:30:31PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-25 13:15]: > > I'm using 'mutt -y' alot to monitor my mailboxes, and I have > > this to be able to see where I have new mail: bind browser $ > >

Re: $check-new

2002-09-25 Thread Sven Guckes
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-25 13:15]: > I'm using 'mutt -y' alot to monitor my mailboxes, and I have > this to be able to see where I have new mail: bind browser $ > check-new Although I'm experienceing some "buggy" behaivor by

$check-new

2002-09-25 Thread Johan Svedberg
Hi, all. I'm using 'mutt -y' alot to monitor my mailboxes, and I have this to be able to see where I have new mail: bind browser $ check-new Although I'm experienceing some "buggy" behaivor by mutt. Sometimes (I can't see a pattern) it doesn't give th