On 2002-03-20, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
: It's quite clear what he wants, and it's not to stymie mutt with
: a logical error. Please don't assume idiocy on the part of your
: correspondents just because you're brilliant.
:)
: No. "If there is no match among mutt's i
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 19:47]:
> * On 2002.03.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> * "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Tres Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 08:04]:
> > > It would also be O.K. to see the external
> > > query results only if there was n
* On 2002.03.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Tres Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 08:04]:
> > I'm wondering if there's a way to bind
> > complete and complete-query to the same key,
> > rather than two keys as shown in the manual:
>
> yo
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:43:19AM -0700, Tres Hofmeister wrote:
> I'm wondering if there's a way to bind complete and
> complete-query to the same key, rather than two keys as shown in
> the manual:
>
> completecomplete filename or alias
>^T c
begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 07:21:23PM +0100:
>
> you cannot bind two commands to one key. period.
> (which command should mutt execute then? exactly.)
The first one bound, followed by the second one?
msg25794/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Tres Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 08:04]:
> I'm wondering if there's a way to bind
> complete and complete-query to the same key,
> rather than two keys as shown in the manual:
you cannot bind two commands to one key. period.
(which command should mutt execute then? exactly.)
>
I'm wondering if there's a way to bind complete and
complete-query to the same key, rather than two keys as shown in
the manual:
completecomplete filename or alias
^T complete-query complete address with query
I'd like to hit the tab
