In the ongoing battle against spammers the latest trick is them not
including a message-id header at all.
Is there a recipe for Mutt to detect this and score accordingly? Going over
the doc and searching the web I haven't had any luck finding any discussion
on this.
Thanks.
/jl
--
ASCII ribbon
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:53:03AM +, John Long wrote:
> In the ongoing battle against spammers the latest trick is them not
> including a message-id header at all.
>
> Is there a recipe for Mutt to detect this and score accordingly? Going over
> the doc and searching the web I haven't had any
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:14:29AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> >From a quick test, it looks like the simple pattern:
> !~h message-id
Also, from my testing, make sure you use all lower-case, or mutt will
treat it as a case-sensitive match.
w
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:14:29AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:53:03AM +, John Long wrote:
> > In the ongoing battle against spammers the latest trick is them not
> > including a message-id header at all.
> >
> > Is there a recipe for Mutt to detect this and score a
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:32:04PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:14:29AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> > >From a quick test, it looks like the simple pattern:
> > !~h message-id
>
> Also, from my testing, make sure you use all lower-case, or mutt will
> treat it as a case-
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:51:11AM +, Koralatov wrote:
> * John Long wrote on 2014-12-19 08:18 +:
> >>Many MTAs will add one if it's not present (in Postfix, this is
> >>determined by $always_add_missing_headers).
> >
> >I understand that but these are spammers who seem to be stupid and are
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 08:18:50AM +, John Long wrote:
> > Many MTAs will add one if it's not present (in Postfix, this is
> > determined by $always_add_missing_headers).
>
> I understand that but these are spammers who seem to be stupid and are
> trying to obfuscate themselves at the same tim
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 10:19:27PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 08:18:50AM +, John Long wrote:
> > > Many MTAs will add one if it's not present (in Postfix, this is
> > > determined by $always_add_missing_headers).
> >
> > I understand that but these are spammers who se
* John Long [12-21-14 04:37]:
[...]
> My point is, Mutt is my MTA and my MUA. I use Mutt's builtin IMAP, POP,
> and SMTP. The emails I get from specific spammers have no message-id
> and that is unique and if I can killfile based on that I will have
> eliminated another category of bastards.
No
> My point is, Mutt is my MTA and my MUA. I use Mutt's builtin IMAP, POP, and
> SMTP. The emails I get from specific spammers have no message-id and that is
> unique and if I can killfile based on that I will have eliminated another
> category of bastards.
Mutt is not *receiving* your emails from
10 matches
Mail list logo
