On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 09:40:50PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Benjamin Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-01-70 11:34]:
Okay, unfortunately there is some more problem: I only want to see all
of the recipients only their own address. Not like when bcc is used
and they will see the
* Benjamin Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-29-07 06:05]:
Okay, as a workaround this should work for me, too. Thanks. But I don't
want my mails regarded as possible spam for the to-field isn't correct.
Please explain to-field isn't correct and site rfc's supporting your
supposition.
Maybe
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 07:24:43AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
Please explain to-field isn't correct and site rfc's supporting your
supposition.
Correct was not quite the right word. What I wanted to say is, that
the to-field ideally should present the address of the recipient an not
Okay, as a workaround this should work for me, too. Thanks. But I don't
want my mails regarded as possible spam for the to-field isn't correct.
Please explain to-field isn't correct and site rfc's supporting your
supposition.
undisclosed-decipients:; is a valid content for the To: header,
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:00:11PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
You can also just make one up, if you don't mind the bounce. example.com
and example.net are even reserved by IANA, and will never (again) be
valid domains for actual users.
Ah, I did not know that (RFC2606 [1]).
Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, July 29 at 01:29 AM, quoth Benjamin Eckenfels:
Okay, unfortunately there is some more problem: I only want to see
all of the recipients only their own address. Not like when bcc is
used and they will see the address of the primary
* Benjamin Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-01-70 11:34]:
Okay, unfortunately there is some more problem: I only want to see all
of the recipients only their own address. Not like when bcc is used
and they will see the address of the primary recipient.
Basically I want to sent a bunch of
