On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 05:38:15PM -0600, Travis H. wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:34:19PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
Is there still considerable danger in dumping html via w3m or
some other html to text converter?
Well, theoretically, any time you operate on data provided by someone
who
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:04:23PM -0600, Travis H. wrote:
I would say your best angle is a security angle. See if you can get
someone with the authority to recognize that reading your email with a
web browser and/or sending HTML poses a threat to the security of the
company and the users
=- Marc Vaillant wrote on Thu 8.Feb'07 at 11:58:48 -0500 -=
Is there still considerable danger in dumping html via w3m or
some other html to text converter?
No, see wiki FAQ how to make it work.
Also, we correspond with several DoD organizations on a weekly
basis. We've never had an email
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:34:19PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
=- Marc Vaillant wrote on Thu 8.Feb'07 at 11:58:48 -0500 -=
Is there still considerable danger in dumping html via w3m or
some other html to text converter?
No, see wiki FAQ how to make it work.
Ok thanks. I do it now, just
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:34:19PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
Is there still considerable danger in dumping html via w3m or
some other html to text converter?
Well, theoretically, any time you operate on data provided by someone
who may not be trustworthy, you face a risk. The magnitude of the
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:31:03PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
... one part being the defensive things listed by Travis, but you
also shouldn't forget that some outsiders rate html-ized mails
as spammy, so at least the score increases or in the worst case
it's outright blocked unless white-listed.
=- Travis H. wrote on Thu 1.Feb'07 at 23:04:23 -0600 -=
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:59:51PM -0500, Marc Vaillant wrote:
This just isn't realistic. What sort of view of mutt do you
think an outlook user (potential mutt user) is going to get if
I tell them Hey check out this great text based
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:59:51PM -0500, Marc Vaillant wrote:
This just isn't realistic. What sort of view of mutt do you think an
outlook user (potential mutt user) is going to get if I tell them Hey
check out this great text based MUA that I have... only thing is, you
know that feature
