Hi, everybody.
I'm sitting here trying to get mutt to color all reply's to mails I've
written. This is what I've got now:
folder-hook . "color index green black '~h in-reply-to:.*acc.umu.se'"
This works. It's just that it has one downside, for example if a
mailinglist has several people from *a
At Sun, Sep 22 2002 [13:35 +0200], Johan Svedberg aroused my curiosity with:
> Hi, everybody.
Hallo :-)
> I'm sitting here trying to get mutt to color all reply's to mails I've
> written. This is what I've got now:
> folder-hook . "color index green black '~h in-reply-to:.*acc.umu.se'"
Try thi
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote:
> At Sun, Sep 22 2002 [13:35 +0200], Johan Svedberg aroused my curiosity with:
> > Hi, everybody.
>
> Hallo :-)
>
> > I'm sitting here trying to get mutt to color all reply's to mails I've
> > written. This is what I've got now:
>
>
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-22 13:35]:
> written. This is what I've got now:
>
> folder-hook . "color index green black '~h in-reply-to:.*acc.umu.se'"
>
> This works. It's just that it has one downside, for example if a
> mailinglist has several people from *acc.umu.se alot of
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 11:10:08AM -0500, David Rock wrote:
> How about:
> folder-hook . "color index green black '~Q'"
>
> According to section 4.2:
> ~Q messages which have been replied to
No. That's messages which I have replied to, ie messages that has the
'r' flag.
Regards, Johan
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-09-22 13:26 -0400:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 11:10:08AM -0500, David Rock wrote:
> > How about:
> > folder-hook . "color index green black '~Q'"
> >
> > According to section 4.2:
> > ~Q messages which have been replied to
>
> No. That's messages
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-22 18:24]:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 11:10:08AM -0500, David Rock wrote:
> > How about:
> > folder-hook . "color index green black '~Q'"
> >
> > According to section 4.2:
> > ~Q messages which have been replied to
>
> No. That's messages whic
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-22 11:36]:
> I'm sitting here trying to get mutt to color all replys
> to mails I've written. This is what I've got now:
>
> folder-hook . "color index green black '~h in-reply-to:.*acc.umu.se'"
>
> This works. It's just that it has one downside, for e
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-23 02:00]:
> * Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-22 11:36]:
> > I'm sitting here trying to get mutt to color all replys
> > to mails I've written. This is what I've got now:
I get it now... color all mails that other people have replied to *you
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:31:30PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote:
> > At Sun, Sep 22 2002 [13:35 +0200], Johan Svedberg aroused my curiosity with:
> > > Hi, everybody.
> >
> > Hallo :-)
> >
> > > I'm sitting here trying to get mutt to
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 05:26:21PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote:
> Hmmm, what about generating your own Message-ID header? Like
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' then I could set a more accurate EXPR. But will that
> screw other things up?
Hmmm, that would brake against some ISO standard? :)
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-22 15:26]:
> Hmmm, what about generating your own Message-ID header?
> Like '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' then I could set a more
> accurate EXPR. But will that screw other things up?
at some companies/universities with bofhs you'd lose your account.
but if yo
12 matches
Mail list logo
