On 1999-05-25 12:39:10 -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> I found this one on rufus earlier this week and mailed him to see if it's
> kept current and if I can link to it somewhere... I'd have to wonder if
> sticking it on Geocities is really kosher though. I'm pretty sure they are
> in the US.
Wel
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 12:23:11PM +0200, Thomas Roessler said:
> On 1999-05-24 13:36:47 -0500, G. T. Francisco, III wrote:
>
> > I've just upgraded via RPM to 95.5i to take advantage of the compressed
> > folders patch. I did it via RPM as I'm really not that comfortable
> > compiling and instal
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 02:12:52PM -0500, David DeSimone said:
> G. T. Francisco, III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > After upgrading, I've lost the ability to do PGP (I'm using PGP5),
> > e.g. if I get a signed message, I just get a "sh: v: command not
> > found" message.
>
> Mutt is tryin
On 1999-05-24 13:36:47 -0500, G. T. Francisco, III wrote:
> I've just upgraded via RPM to 95.5i to take advantage of the compressed
> folders patch. I did it via RPM as I'm really not that comfortable
> compiling and installing tarballs.
Just out of curiosity: What's the source for 0.95.5 RPMs w
G. T. Francisco, III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After upgrading, I've lost the ability to do PGP (I'm using PGP5),
> e.g. if I get a signed message, I just get a "sh: v: command not
> found" message.
Mutt is trying to run the "pgpv" command, by taking your configured
"pgp" command and addi
Hi all,
I've just upgraded via RPM to 95.5i to take advantage of the compressed
folders patch. I did it via RPM as I'm really not that comfortable
compiling and installing tarballs.
After upgrading, I've lost the ability to do PGP (I'm using PGP5), e.g.
if I get a signed message, I just get a "s
