On 2000-09-06 23:17:27 +0200, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> Could you elaborate? How do you make a file system perform better
> in relation to maildirs? I use reiserfs and I too think that
> maildirs are slower when opening folders beyond a certain size. I
> therefore keep my folders below approx.
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 2000-09-05 20:44:42 +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
>
> > I switched from mbox to Maildir a few days ago. I always had the
> > feeling that Maildir is much slower - well for big Mailboxes at
> > least - than mbox. Now I did some testing.
>
> This might
On 2000-09-05 20:44:42 +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> I switched from mbox to Maildir a few days ago. I always had the
> feeling that Maildir is much slower - well for big Mailboxes at
> least - than mbox. Now I did some testing.
This might be related to your file system's performance.
--
Thoma
Michael Tatge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I switched from mbox to Maildir a few days ago. I always had the
> feeling that Maildir is much slower - well for big Mailboxes at least
> - than mbox. Now I did some testing.
>
> 2970 Messeges
> - 9 MB mbox file : 4 secs
> - as Maildir (tot
Hi all!
I switched from mbox to Maildir a few days ago. I always had the
feeling that Maildir is much slower - well for big Mailboxes at least
- than mbox. Now I did some testing.
2970 Messeges
- 9 MB mbox file : 4 secs
- as Maildir (totals to 10 MB): 10 secs
- Maildir (cashed i.e. read the same
