Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> From this behavior it is clear that the "second" hook in fact runs
> first, and vice versa.
Actually, the folder-hooks are run in the order listed in your .muttrc.
However, each invocation of exec or push adds to the *front* of the
input buffer. Hence the contents of the s
* Ian Zimmerman [06-26-15 12:05]:
> It seems when multiple hooks exist for the same context (in particular,
> multiple folder-hooks matching on ".*"), they're executed in reverse
> order of appearance in .muttrc.
>
> >From the 1st day I started using mutt seriously I had this in .muttrc:
>
> fol
It seems when multiple hooks exist for the same context (in particular,
multiple folder-hooks matching on ".*"), they're executed in reverse
order of appearance in .muttrc.
>From the 1st day I started using mutt seriously I had this in .muttrc:
folder-hook .* "exec collapse-all"
But, this result
