* On 2002.04.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> anyway, if someone with a non-FQDN MID
> has a problem with his email setup then
> I'd not help him unless he gets one.
> same goes for people using pseudo names.
>
> end of story.
The thing is, this i
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-08 19:11]:
> > * Sven Guckes wrote:
> > > | Message-ID: <20020403210712.A1308@PROGENY>
> > > | User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
> > > broken MID and old mutt version.
> > > upgrade and get a FQDN! :-p
> I think you're wrong: a dot in the Message-ID's RHS is
>
»Luke Ross« sagte am 2002-04-08 um 18:57:44 +0100 :
> As regards FQDN, if you'll pay for it! It's currently a dodgy NAT'd
Why pay? Get a dyndns account and there you've got your FQDN.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:
--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! David Champion spake thus:
> I think you're wrong: a dot in the Message-ID's RHS is not mandatory,
> and the Message-ID is not required to match your sendin
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:43:54PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> >
> > | Message-ID: <20020403210712.A1308@PROGENY>
> > | User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
> >
> > broken MID and old mutt version.
> > upgrade and get a FQDN! :-p
I think you're wrong: a dot in the Message-ID's RHS is not mandatory,
and
begin quoting what Luke Ross said on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:57:44PM +0100:
>
> As regards FQDN, if you'll pay for it! It's currently a dodgy NAT'd
> set-up. The Received headers show this one up ;-)
So's mine, but I still have an FQDN.
Gotta learn to use the tools to your advantage.
--
S
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:43:54PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> | Message-ID: <20020403210712.A1308@PROGENY>
> | User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
>
> broken MID and old mutt version.
> upgrade and get a FQDN! :-p
Will upgrade when I get the urge to do my patch cocktail, but it doesn't
apply clea
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 06:59:26PM +, Simon White wrote:
> 02-Apr-02 at 19:48, Luke Ross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > I use mutt patched with vvv-nntp (I know not now - I'm on holiday on a
> > strange computer), and if the NNTP connection gets closed it asks if you
> > want to reconnec
02-Apr-02 at 19:48, Luke Ross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> I use mutt patched with vvv-nntp (I know not now - I'm on holiday on a
> strange computer), and if the NNTP connection gets closed it asks if you
> want to reconnect, and then continues where it left off - perhaps IMAP can
> be patched to
