Hi!
On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 10:31:50AM +0200, J Horacio MG wrote:
> Silly question... but I just have to ask:
>
> What indicates whether a version is stable/unstable?
For the last 0.x versions the ones with the odd numbers behind the
point were stable, with the even numbers (0.96) unstable.
Th
Thomas Roessler dijo:
> On 1999-09-03 16:58:54 -0700, A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
>
> Wrong way around. These variables are used by the unstable branch,
> that is, 0.96. They are _not_ used by 0.95, or 1.0.
Silly question... but I just have to ask:
What indicates whether a version is stable/u
On 1999-09-03 16:58:54 -0700, A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
> These aren't totally required, but I did stumble across these errors
> in my .muttrc after running mutt 1.0pre1i, 1.0pre2i, and 0.95.7i, involving
> PGP. I am using GnuPG currently, but these errors come up with PGP 2.6.* as
> w
Heya all..
These aren't totally required, but I did stumble across these errors
in my .muttrc after running mutt 1.0pre1i, 1.0pre2i, and 0.95.7i, involving
PGP. I am using GnuPG currently, but these errors come up with PGP 2.6.* as
well. They did work correctly, in 0.95.5i and
