Re: PGP signing range

2000-07-24 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-07-24 12:48:45 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that is, subheader part is not crlf terminated (but the intervening blank line is). Have you tried to verify the signatures with NAI's pgp5 or pgp6? My guess about the cause of the problem would be that gnupg mis-handles some of the

Re: PGP signing range

2000-07-24 Thread horio shoichi
Thomas Roessler wrote: On 2000-07-24 12:48:45 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that is, subheader part is not crlf terminated (but the intervening blank line is). Have you tried to verify the signatures with NAI's pgp5 or pgp6? My guess about the cause of the problem would be that

PGP signing range

2000-07-23 Thread horio
Suppose I have following signed text with mutt: --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline This is a test message. --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z I can verify following test by hand: cat former EOF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii