On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 07:48:55AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20:29AM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> >If you'll need another beta tester, just yell out when the hard work's
> >done. ;-)
>
> If you are subscribed to bug #3424 you will get notified when there
> are
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20:29AM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
If you'll need another beta tester, just yell out when the hard work's
done. ;-)
If you are subscribed to bug #3424 you will get notified when there are
patches to test.
me
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:40:18AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
>
> FYI, I plan to tackle this bug soon. The discussion has not got unnoticed. :)
Grateful thanks, Michael.
If you'll need another beta tester, just yell out when the hard work's
done. ;-)
Erik
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:36:38PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
I logged into the flea tracker, and there's a field which allows
"Add/Change #3424 (Mutt falsely detects its own mbox writes as new
mail.)", but I don't see any simple "me too" option, which could perhaps
have helped us vote the p
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:58:14AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
>
> Before the bug is fixed, I suggest going back to mutt 1.5.18.
>
> I found it has an extra benefit - it opens mailbox much faster than
> 1.5.20. I don't know why, but you can benchmark it. (I have some
> mailboxes of
Thank Erik, and suggestion to Jeff,
Before the bug is fixed, I suggest going back to mutt 1.5.18.
I found it has an extra benefit - it opens mailbox much faster than
1.5.20. I don't know why, but you can benchmark it. (I have some
mailboxes of size 1-200MB. The time-saving for the
