Eugene --
...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
% Eugene Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 14 Jun 2000:
...
% > to the sender's email address, but also takes all the email addresses in
% > the "To:" header and adds them to the "To:" header of the reply. Group
%
% Why should it matter whether t
Eugene Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 14 Jun 2000:
> The feature that I've missed the most from other mailers is some kind of
> reply-to-all function that, given a email message, composes an normal reply
> to the sender's email address, but also takes all the ema
Eugene Lee muttered:
> The feature that I've missed the most from other mailers is some kind of
> reply-to-all function that, given a email message, composes an normal reply
> to the sender's email address, but also takes all the email addresses in
> the "To:"
The feature that I've missed the most from other mailers is some kind of
reply-to-all function that, given a email message, composes an normal reply
to the sender's email address, but also takes all the email addresses in
the "To:" header and adds them to the "To:&quo
> Chris Woodfield:
> It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to only put
> the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as
> well?
the group-reply, documented in the manual and in the quickref screen
launched by '?', is commonly bound to 'g'. just ch
> Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
> > Are you using "r" to reply ?? If so, try "R" instead ;-) (look
through
> > the Muttrc file for "clues" -- "R" is for a "group-reply")
>
> I don't think "R" is the default binding for group-reply, "g" is.
> But the binding can of c
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:40:10AM -0400, Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you using "r" to reply ?? If so, try "R" instead ;-) (look through
> the Muttrc file for "clues" -- "R" is for a "group-reply")
Actually, I believe the default key bindings are 'g' for
'group-reply' and
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
> Are you using "r" to reply ?? If so, try "R" instead ;-) (look through
> the Muttrc file for "clues" -- "R" is for a "group-reply")
I don't think "R" is the default binding for group-reply, "g" is.
But the binding can of course be co
Chris Woodfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
> It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to only put
> the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as
> well?
Yes, use the group-reply function, by default this is accessed with the
"g" k
>> It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to
only put
>> the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as
>> well?
Are you using "r" to reply ?? If so, try "R" instead ;-) (look through
the Muttrc file for "clues" -- "R" is for a "group-reply")
Regard
It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to only put
the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as
well?
-Chris
--
---
Christopher A. Woodfield[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finger for public PGP key 0xB887618B - email fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
