On 03/02/01, 11:22:34AM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2001, John P. Verel wrote:
> > On 03/01/01, 09:45:10PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > > Dirk Laurie muttered:
> >
> > > > Is there a mutt function that lest me reply to the "From" address
> > > > even when "Reply-To" is provide
On Thu, Mar 1, 2001, John P. Verel wrote:
> On 03/01/01, 09:45:10PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > Dirk Laurie muttered:
>
> > > Is there a mutt function that lest me reply to the "From" address
> > > even when "Reply-To" is provided?
> >
> > For this purpose set ignore_list_reply_to. Maybe in
On 03/01/01, 09:45:10PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Dirk Laurie muttered:
> > Is there a mutt function that lest me reply to the "From" address
> > even when "Reply-To" is provided?
>
> For this purpose set ignore_list_reply_to. Maybe in combination with
> sent- or folder-hook.
Hey this is co
Dirk Laurie muttered:
> Very properly, mutt replies to the "Reply-To" address if one is set.
> I belong to some mailing lists where "Reply-To" is set to the list.
> This is OK if I wish to send to the sender and the list ("g") or to
> the list only ("r") but not if I wish to reply to the sender on
* Dirk Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 09:43]:
> Very properly, mutt replies to the "Reply-To" address if one is set.
> I belong to some mailing lists where "Reply-To" is set to the list.
> This is OK if I wish to send to the sender and the list ("g") or to
> the list only ("r") but not if I w
Very properly, mutt replies to the "Reply-To" address if one is set.
I belong to some mailing lists where "Reply-To" is set to the list.
This is OK if I wish to send to the sender and the list ("g") or to
the list only ("r") but not if I wish to reply to the sender only.
E.g. "Listen old chap, I d
