Re: SIMPLER SOLUTION for WWW/CGI interface to mutt

2001-04-11 Thread Raghavendra Bhat
M. Fioretti posts: > It would be more than enough, and far less bandwidth > consuming, something like this: > 1) WWW interface is just as any other webmail interface, >html/javascript/php/frames/CGI forms/etc.. Maybe a package called 'mailreader' is already out there. It is simple and work

SIMPLER SOLUTION for WWW/CGI interface to mutt

2001-04-10 Thread M. Fioretti
Hello, thanks for all the suggestions and interest about my question. I thought it over a bit more, and maybe the solution is simpler than we assumed. What we would like to have is same mutt functionalities on webmail interfaces, and configure these just uploading our home muttrc file (i.e. no