Re: Two alternative proposed fixes [Was: Re: A wish for the mailboxes command]

2010-06-25 Thread Erik Christiansen
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:46:23PM +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote: > Checking for new mail before a user-triggered write operation, as you > suggested, would, I think, fix the issue. Thank you. After checking 114 fleas which mentioned "New mail", I've added ticket #3424. Erik -- The reasonable

Re: Two alternative proposed fixes [Was: Re: A wish for the mailboxes command]

2010-06-25 Thread Michael Ludwig
Erik Christiansen schrieb am 25.06.2010 um 20:48 (+1000): > While that would be a lot of fun, mutt itself does seem able to be > cured of its current fibbing behaviour. (Try copying this message to > this mail folder. Mutt says "New mail in this mailbox." What hokum.) Confirmed :-) > Mutt needs

Two alternative proposed fixes [Was: Re: A wish for the mailboxes command]

2010-06-25 Thread Erik Christiansen
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Chris G wrote: > I don't really want to know when new mail arrives, what I want is the > ability to quickly go to all the mailboxes which have new incoming > mail when I'm running mutt. I don't have any need to respond quickly > to messages, just a need to