Hi,
* Sven Guckes [04/24/02 22:28:31 CEST] wrote:
> webmailers are almost always broken.
Yes.
> there are many reasons to avoid them.
> i'll give a list of reasons - real soon now.
Any chance to include privacy issues? At least there should be
a few notes.
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27619/pgp0.
* Paul Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 12:20]:
> On Friday, Apr 19, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > X-Mailer: ZipLip Sonoma v3.2
> >
> > great - yet another broken mailer
> > which gets added to my killfile.
>
> Isn't ziplip webmail? Not saying that
> it
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19.04.02 20:39]:
> % Btw, am I right that there is no possibility to score by mailer with the
> % score function since ~h is not allowed? So is there any other way to
> No direct possibility, I think, but there are indirect options.
I do know about the possibili
Johannes, et al --
...and then Johannes Berth said...
%
% Btw, am I right that there is no possibility to score by mailer with the
% score function since ~h is not allowed? So is there any other way to
No direct possibility, I think, but there are indirect options.
% score (not only kill) by
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19.04.02 02:15]:
> great - yet another broken mailer
> which gets added to my killfile.
Btw, am I right that there is no possibility to score by mailer with the
score function since ~h is not allowed? So is there any other way to
score (not only kill) by mailer
On Friday, Apr 19, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 19:40]:
> > From: mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Replying with headers
> > Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL P
* mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 19:40]:
> From: mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Replying with headers
> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: ZipLip Sonoma v3.2
no name in FRO
