Hi,
On Thu, Mar 09 2000 14:11:46 -0500 wrote David T-G
with subject "Re: attachments appear as NoName":
> I've lost track of whether [the argument is that] mutt should put a
> 'name="*"' parameter on the Content-Type: header or [the complaint is
> th
Stefan --
I've lost track of whether [the argument is that] mutt should put a
'name="*"' parameter on the Content-Type: header or [the complaint is
that] mutt expects such a parameter. It seems to me that either can be
fixed with scripts.
1) If we want mutt to provide the parameter, change $sen
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 09 2000 10:10:13 + wrote Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
with subject "Re: attachments appear as NoName":
> Here you're comparing a text/plain attachment produced by mutt with an
> application/msword attachment produced by some by some other MUA.
I didn&#
Stefan Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [-- Type: application/msword, Encoding: base64, Size: 16K --]
> Content-Type: application/msword; name="Schedule.doc"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Schedule.doc"
>
> and one of my recently mailed mutt mails s
Hi there,
On Wed, Mar 08 2000 09:07:22 +0100 wrote Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE
with subject "Re: attachments appear as NoName":
> > If these attachments do not have a Content-Disposition filename=
> > field, this would appear correct.
[...]
> > For instan
> This q. was discused here few month ago and ppl from mutt-dev say thats problem
> of dtmail.
>
> Best on the end, dtmail from Solaris 8 distribution have this "bug" too.
And that with me recommending Solaris dtmail to all DecUnix users here
because Dec's dtmail sucks even worse ...
Lars Hecking ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
> > At the company where I work, it seems that most people are using
> > dtmail or netscape mail.
> >
> > When I send mail with attachments from mutt, the attachments appear
> > in those other mail clients as "NoName".
>
> If these attachments do no
> At the company where I work, it seems that most people are using
> dtmail or netscape mail.
>
> When I send mail with attachments from mutt, the attachments appear
> in those other mail clients as "NoName".
If these attachments do not have a Content-Disposition filename=
field, this would
Hello,
At the company where I work, it seems that most people are using
dtmail or netscape mail.
When I send mail with attachments from mutt, the attachments appear
in those other mail clients as "NoName".
I can't figure this out. The attachments appear just fine in the
Bcc: copy of the mail t
