Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-16 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Feb 12 2008, Kyle Wheeler wrote: the effort of writing it to /dev/null. Unfortunately, you can't use fcc-hook to specify nothing. For example, this won't work: fcc-hook ~u I'm not sure why. Hello Kyle, Shouldn't this be considered as a bug, and /dev/null just an ugly

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread SK
(i.e. unset copy) but in the compose window speficy that I want to keep a copy on a per-email basis? Of course I can CC or BCC myself but that is too much work :) Well, copy is a quad-option, meaning that you can tell mutt to ask you every time. The valid options are: yes, no, ask-yes

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread SK
If you need something more complicated, such as in my friends folder, I want to save to folder X, but in the inbox, I want to save to folder Y then you'll need to completely change the macro with a folder-hook, like so: folder-hook INBOX 'macro compose S edit-fcckill-lineYenter'

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, February 12 at 08:58 PM, quoth SK: I can almost use this, except for a small hurdle. I need to set the fcc file name based on the mailbox folder. Currently I use 'folder-hook' to do that. Is there anyway I can tweak this macro to

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread SK
The easy solution would seem to be to define the macro within the folder-hook you already have. Didn't know I could do that. It works! Thanks everyone!

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread SK
Do you want to press a key to make mutt save messages to a specific folder, but to not do so if you do not press this key? Yes, exactly, without even having to answer the Yes/No question (if I set ask-yes, or ask-no option) every time. copy: no define a macro compose

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, February 12 at 08:19 PM, quoth SK: Do you want to press a key to make mutt save messages to a specific folder, but to not do so if you do not press this key? Yes, exactly, without even having to answer the Yes/No question (if I set

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread SK
Do you want to press a key to make mutt save messages to a specific folder, but to not do so if you do not press this key? Yes, exactly, without even having to answer the Yes/No question (if I set ask-yes, or ask-no option) every time. SK

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread David Champion
Do you want to press a key to make mutt save messages to a specific folder, but to not do so if you do not press this key? Yes, exactly, without even having to answer the Yes/No question (if I set ask-yes, or ask-no option) every time. This might do it. ## Set copy to no when initiating

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, February 12 at 08:06 PM, quoth SK: Thanks for the informative reply Kyle. I think I will use the fcc-hook way but before that, just to reconfirm - there is no simple option (say a key binding) that is equivalent to checking the Save

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread Kyle Wheeler
) but in the compose window speficy that I want to keep a copy on a per-email basis? Of course I can CC or BCC myself but that is too much work :) Well, copy is a quad-option, meaning that you can tell mutt to ask you every time. The valid options are: yes, no, ask-yes, and ask-no (the two variants

copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread SK
Hi all, As far as I read the amanual, set copy allows one to specify whether to keep a copy of all sent emails. Is there any way in which I can disable this behavior by default (i.e. unset copy) but in the compose window speficy that I want to keep a copy on a per-email basis? Of course I can CC

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread Michael Kjorling
On 12 Feb 2008 20:58 +0100, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (SK): macro compose change-field-in-compose-menukill-linevalue-for-fieldenter I can almost use this, except for a small hurdle. I need to set the fcc file name based on the mailbox folder. Currently I use 'folder-hook' to do that. Is

Re: copy on a per email basis

2008-02-12 Thread Rado S
=- SK wrote on Tue 12.Feb'08 at 20:19:22 +0100 -= Do you want to press a key to make mutt save messages to a specific folder, but to not do so if you do not press this key? Yes, exactly, without even having to answer the Yes/No question (if I set ask-yes, or ask-no option) every time.