Garry Williams proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> The reason you may want to configure sendmail to do "The Right Thing"
> instead of Suresh's solution is that Suresh's suggestion will cause an
> X-Authentication-Warning header to be included with your message:
This can be solved by adding your
Jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 15 Nov 2000:
> Should that be `-F' instead of `-f' ?
Nope.
> -F fullname
> Set the full name of the sender.
The "full name" is already specified in the From: header.
> -f name
> Sets the name of the "from"
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 12:08:43AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > I need a work around for mutt or regular unix mail on the following
> > problem. When I sent to some addresses they want to verify my domain or
> > they will not acce
-: You can set the envelope sender in older mutts with
-: set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -oem -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Should that be `-F' instead of `-f' ?
Here's what `man sendmail' says, but
it didn't answer the question (for me).
-F fullname
Set the full name of t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I need a work around for mutt or regular unix mail on the following
> problem. When I sent to some addresses they want to verify my domain or
> they will not accept the message. My domain is not valid. How can I send
> a message and have cont
I need a work around for mutt or regular unix mail on the following
problem. When I sent to some addresses they want to verify my domain or
they will not accept the message. My domain is not valid. How can I send
a message and have control of the internet address in the FROM information
on an A
