Re: just another send-hook question

1999-11-12 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 07:10:25 +0100, Richard P. Groenewegen wrote: > Hi, > > Here's something that's either trivial or impossible. I want > something like > > send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' '' > > but I'll only want this send-hook to work if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only > recipien

Re: just another send-hook question

1999-11-12 Thread David DeSimone
Richard P. Groenewegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' '' > > but I'll only want this send-hook to work if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only > recipient. Isn't there a pattern modifier "^" that means "only"? send-hook '^~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' '' That matc

just another send-hook question

1999-11-11 Thread Richard P. Groenewegen
Hi, Here's something that's either trivial or impossible. I want something like send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' '' but I'll only want this send-hook to work if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only recipient. On a related note: how do I limit to all messages send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but