Re: limit question

1999-04-20 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 10:36:15 -0700, Robert Chien wrote: 3. Binding ^L to unlimit in the source code? so that when you press '?' for help and search for 'limit', it'll come up? You can put comments into your macro defintions so searching will work fine without changing the source code.

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread Richard P. Groenewegen
On Sat, Apr 17, 1999 at 11:36:27AM +0200, Michael Thies wrote: Bevan Broun hat ueber "Re: limit question" geschrieben: Odd. I always just "l all". "l *" is shorter. But it shows me, that all messages are limited. And when using "l all" I get

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread David Shaw
On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 12:48:25PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: Robert Chien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, I've noticed that if I do limit, delete, sync, multiple times in random order, sometimes all New mails in my inbox are marked read! I have not been able to reproduce it, but it's

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread David DeSimone
Robert Chien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. I'm sure people will ask this question in the future again, so how about putting this in the doc? I think Section 4. Advanced Usage is suitable. Hey, Mutt is an Open Source program. That means that YOU can go and put it into the docs, written up

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread David DeSimone
Robert Chien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, I've noticed that if I do limit, delete, sync, multiple times in random order, sometimes all New mails in my inbox are marked read! I have not been able to reproduce it, but it's possibly a bug. I'm using IMAP. The new/old status is controlled

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread Robert Chien
On Sun, Apr 18, 1999 at 04:28:03PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote: On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 06:38:17PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote: This is good, but wouldn't it be more intuitive to show me all messages when the limit is blank? developers, would you consider this? We had this discussion

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread Einar Indridason
limit string that matches nothing, like "b6a3", to make the limit fail so that it'll take me back to the full inbox. Is there a more elegant way? The command to show all messages is ~b A I use "~l all" (yes, I did use Elm before...) I have one complaint about mutt, however... It is too

Re: limit question

1999-04-18 Thread Stefan `Sec` Zehl
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 06:38:17PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote: This is good, but wouldn't it be more intuitive to show me all messages when the limit is blank? developers, would you consider this? We had this discussion already. I then wrote a patch to do this (for .89 - you could get it from