hi all,
does anyone know why an email sent by netscape3 on unix is well received on my
Lotus Notes client (NT4), and an email sent by mutt on the same machine isn't ?
thanks,
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 01:39:36PM +0100, Arnaud De Timmerman wrote:
> does anyone know why an email sent by netscape3 on unix is well received
> on my Lotus Notes client (NT4), and an email sent by mutt on the same
> machine isn't ?
More details please? "Bloated Goats"
ud De Timmerman on Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 01:39:36PM +0100:
>
>
> hi all,
>
> does anyone know why an email sent by netscape3 on unix is well received on my
> Lotus Notes client (NT4), and an email sent by mutt on the same machine isn't ?
>
> thanks,
I know this sounds weird, but without POP3 connectivity, anyone here
know if there is a way to get mutt to work with a Notes server? At
my new job, that is what they use, and the Notes client is a piece of
crap. I can't believe I'm saying this, but I have gained respect for
Outhouse! My boss an
>What was the contend of the mail?
>Did you attach something?
>Did you use encryption?
>What exactly went wrong (what was the error, how did you notice)?
We use unix on server, some of our customers and we are using lotus notes on our
desktops (it's not a choice). We have
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-05 15:04]:
> I know this sounds weird, but without POP3 connectivity, anyone here
> know if there is a way to get mutt to work with a Notes server? At my
> new job, that is what they use, and the Notes client is a piece of
> crap. I can't believe I'm s
* darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-05 19:44]:
> * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-05 15:04]:
> > I know this sounds weird, but without POP3 connectivity, anyone here
> > know if there is a way to get mutt to work with a Notes server? At my
> > new job, that is what they u
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-05 22:07]:
> * darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-05 19:44]:
> > Notes has an IMAP interface, which is, AFAIK, compatible with other
> > IMAP implementations. I have co-worker who have used mutt with our
> > internal Notes server without too
On Thu, Jun 6, 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> This was about two years ago; I think the problems were with mutt's IMAP
> support (I remember him trying to diagnose segfaults), but I'm not sure,
> because it wasn't me, and I know better than to acknowledge the Notes
> server. ;)
At this point
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 02:24:53PM +0100, Arnaud De Timmerman wrote:
> We use unix on server, some of our customers and we are using lotus notes on our
> desktops (it's not a choice). We have to send text-only (no mime/smime contents
> at first...) emails to those platforms. But i
Dear Mutt users,
I don't know if this is specific to mutt (in fact I don't think so), but maybe
someone here can help me. How can I reply to a lotus notes invitation within
mutt? I see that the said invitation is a ics file and perhaps just changing
one of the field can do it, but I
I've applied the outlook pgp patch to mutt v1.2.5. Everything is great,
but my boss, who uses Lotus Notes :-( has complained that my messages show
up as "msg.pgp" attachments! Looking at the headers of sent messages, they
look "normal" (pgp stuff in msg body, etc.),
seems to run
fine, but perhaps someone could tell me if I've broken anything? :-)
Here's my small mod:
1500 /* jsmoriss: fix for lotus notes - exclude msg.pgp filename from */
1501 /* content-disposition */
1502
1503 b->unlink = 1;
1504 b->disposition = DISPINL
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 04:33:07PM -0400 or thereabouts, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote:
> I've applied the outlook pgp patch to mutt v1.2.5. Everything is great,
> but my boss, who uses Lotus Notes :-( has complained that my messages show
> up as "msg.pgp" attachments! L
14 matches
Mail list logo
