Is there a way to allow mutt to use the same save folders as well?
That would be perfect.
-=> jm <=-
Please CC me on all replies
---
"The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long, and you have
burned so very, very brightly."
Jonathon,
> Is there a way to allow mutt to use the same save folders as well?
> That would be perfect.
There should be a complete Mutt customization file for Pine-like behavior
in contrib. However, I found the following to be good enough for switching
back and forth between Mutt and Pine:
# Ma
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 04:51:46PM +, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
> I am trying to learn mutt alongside pine. Are there any settings i should
> put in my .muttrc so i can be reasonably sure that both mailboxes will be
> compatible? Is there a way to use my pine save folders with mutt as well?
I am trying to learn mutt alongside pine. Are there any settings i should put in my
.muttrc so i can
be reasonably sure that both mailboxes will be compatible? Is there a way to use my
pine save
folders with mutt as well?
I recently ran mutt on a shell account and saw no messages. Running pi
* Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000207 11:49]:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 11:50:01AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > On 2000-02-07 09:07:23 +, Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > > This is all very well but it's a bit unlikely that every other
> > > MUA in the world is going to get fixed just to s
On 2000-02-07 11:26:13 +, Chris Green wrote:
> Yes, I know that, but realistically are the rest of the world's
> MUAs going to become PGP/MIME conformant - ever?
You should ask NAI and friends this question. After all, for most
of the world's MUAs, NAI's plugins will be the thing which
dete
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 11:50:01AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-02-07 09:07:23 +, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > This is all very well but it's a bit unlikely that every other
> > MUA in the world is going to get fixed just to satisfy mutt
> > users.
>
> We're not talking aobut satisfyi
On 2000-02-07 09:07:23 +, Chris Green wrote:
> This is all very well but it's a bit unlikely that every other
> MUA in the world is going to get fixed just to satisfy mutt
> users.
We're not talking aobut satisfying mutt users, but about
implementing specifications which are on the Standards
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 01:51:10PM +0100, Terje Elde wrote:
> IMHO mutt is the *one* mailer that's using PGP/MIME right, so this isn't
> the place to start looking for a solution :)
>
> You don't fix what's right to support what's broken, you fix what's broken
> to be right.
>
> * Christopher Sm
> It would also help a lot if there were a Win32 port of mutt, or at least
> one good windows client that supports PGP/MIME. Like you said, windows
> users currently are SOL.
My understanding is that the grant given to the GPG developers by
the German government will mainly go into the devel
On 02/04, Christopher Smith wrote:
> 1) what can be done to improve upon the situation, and
Imagine if we could convince AOL and hotmail to transparently include
PGP/MIME (and keyring) support and enable it by default, guiding them
along the process of key management and the like. Instantly we
IMHO mutt is the *one* mailer that's using PGP/MIME right, so this isn't
the place to start looking for a solution :)
You don't fix what's right to support what's broken, you fix what's broken
to be right.
* Christopher Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000205 12:54]:
> So, I guess I have two questions
On Fri, 04 Feb 2000, Christopher Smith wrote:
> 1) PGP/MIME signed documents don't work well with Outlook Express. In
> particular, it seems to think the plaintext has to be viewed as an
> attachment.
Blame Outlook. It cannot handle multipart/signed or
multipart/encrypted (at least in older vers
positions to
these body parts may be a work-around for this. The patch is in the
unstable CVS branch.
> 3) PGP/MIME seems to cause some e-mail clients (in particular
> Eudora) to crash upon opening. I have no idea what the deal is
> with this.
I'd suggest you report this as an err
laintext has to be viewed as an
attachment.
2) PGP/MIME support in basically ALL the windows mail clients out
there is shoddy at best. I still haven't found one that will properly
recognize a message as PGP/MIME, decode an encrypted message and then
validate the signature.
3) PGP/MIME seems
15 matches
Mail list logo
